Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 26.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2011 Oct 26;52(43):5656–5658. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.08.096

Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling of Benzylic Bromides Under Microwave Conditions

Steven W McDaniel 1, Charles M Keyari 1, Kevin C Rider 1, Nicholas R Natale 1, Philippe Diaz 1,*
PMCID: PMC3182109  NIHMSID: NIHMS321569  PMID: 21966033

Abstract

A procedure for benzylic Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling under microwave conditions has been developed. These conditions allowed for heterocyclic compounds to be coupled. Optimum conditions found were Pd(OAc)2, JohnPhos as the catalyst and ligand, potassium carbonate as base, and DMF as the solvent. Using these conditions, a library of structurally diverse compounds was synthesized.

Keywords: Suzuki-Miyaura, Cross-Coupling, Microwave, Palladium


System xc (Sxc) is a membrane transporter that functions as an obligate exchanger of L-glutamate (L-Glu) and cystine.1 The high concentration of L-Glu within cells drives the export of L-Glu and the import of cystine in a 1:1 molar ratio.2 Sxc transporter has emerged as a very promising target for CNS disorders such as drug addiction,3 viral pathology,4 and brain tumor growth because of its role in oxidative protection5, blood brain barrier operation, neurotransmitter release, and synaptic organization.6 We recently reported a novel series of Sxc inhibitors based on an isoxazole scaffold.7 Inhibition of Sxc reduces the tumor cells ability to protect itself from oxidative stress.

To further explore structure-activity relationships of this series we sought to introduce an aromatic cycle at the benzylic C5 position of an isoxazole. One straightforward approach to introduce the aromatic ring at the benzylic C5 position of an isoxazole would be to use a Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction. There are very few examples in the literature of Suzuki couplings at the benzylic position and no examples involving heteroaryl benzylic bromide. Benzylic carbonates have been coupled using [Pd]-DPPPent with K2CO3 and DMF.8 McLaughlin coupled benzylic phosphates with Pd(OAc)2/PPh3.9 Burns et al. coupled heteroarylboronic acids with benzylic carbons.10 Molander et al. developed protocol using potassium organotrifluoroborates as the nucleophilic boron.11 Chowdhury et al.12 and Ines et al.13 also used water in their protocols. Unfortunately, this route fails using previously described protocols because of the water sensitivity of ethyl 1,2-oxazole-3-carboxylate derivatives. Our previous attempts at this coupling have resulted in low yields in our series of compounds. We developed a protocol that is useful for the coupling of water sensitive compounds. Optimizing this coupling is necessary to create a library of Sxc inhibitors. In this present paper, we report a method for the palladium- catalyzed benzylic arylation of isoxazole and benzoate derivatives with arylboronic acids.

The isoxazole was prepared using previously reported synthetic strategy.14,15 In our initial attempt at the benzylic coupling, phenyl boronic acid was used, but the compound resulting from Suzuki coupling was only separable from the starting material by HPLC. In order to have a better monitoring of the reaction, 3-methoxybenzeneboronic acids and the isoxazole were used for the optimization of the Suzuki coupling under microwave conditions. Microwave was used instead of classical heating to shorten reaction time. Yields were comparable between conventional and microwave heating. Details on the experimental protocol used are mentioned in Table 1, and 2.

Table 1.

Condition screen for benzylic Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reactions under microwave conditions. a

graphic file with name nihms321569u1.jpg
Entry Base Solvent Yield %
1 Cs2CO3 Dioxane 10
2b Cs2CO3 Dioxane 10
3c Cs2CO3 Dioxane 10
4 Cs2CO3 THF 10
5 Cs2CO3 DMF 15
6 NaHCO3 DMF 15
7 K2CO3 DMF 15
8d K2CO3 DMF 15
a

Reaction conditions: boronic acid (1.5 mmol), isoxazole bromide (1.0 mmol), base (3.0 mmol), Pd (PPh3)4 (5 mol %), solvent (2 mL), 20 minutes.

b

duration was 60 minutes.

c

temperature 160°C.

d

Ag2O (2.5 mmol) was added.

Table 2.

Condition screen for benzylic Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reactions under microwave conditions. a

graphic file with name nihms321569u2.jpg
Entry Catalyst System Base Temp (°C) Yield %
9a PdCl2(dppf) K2CO3 140 15
10 PdCl2(dppf) K2CO3 140 15
11 Pd(OAc)2, L1 K2CO3 140 25
12 Pd(OAc)2, L2 K2CO3 140 50.4d
13 Pd(OAc)2, L2 K2CO3 150 40
14 Pd(OAc)2, L2 K2CO3 130 44d
15 Pd(OAc)2, L2 K2CO3 80 10
16c Pd(OAc)2, L2 K2CO3 80 15
17 Pd(OAc)2, L3 K2CO3 140 25
18 Pd(OAc)2, L2 Et3N 140 25
19 Pd(OAc)2, L3 Et3N 140 25
a

Reaction conditions: boronic acid (1.5 mmol), bromide (1.0 mmol), base (3.0 mmol), catalyst (5 mol %), ligand (10 mol %), DMF (2 mL), 20 minutes.

b

Ag2O (2.5 mmol) was added.

c

duration was 60 minutes.

d

Isolated yield.

Conversion yields were determined by LCMS analysis. A low yield, approximately 10%, was achieved when coupling 3-methoxybenzeneboronic acid to the isoxazole using Pd(PPh3)4 as a catalyst, Cs2CO3 as a base, and with dioxane as a solvent.

To improve the yield of this reaction several modifications were explored. Increasing the time or the temperature did not improve the yield (Table 1, entry 1, 2, 3). We then studied the impact of solvent on the yield. Using DMF slightly increased the yield compared to dioxane and THF (Table 1, entry 5). Changes to the base had no effect on the yield. It has been proposed that silver oxide increases the rate of boron to palladium transfer step of the catalytic cycle.16,17 Use of silver oxide (Table 1, entry 8) had no effect on the yield. We decided to use the pre-catalysts PdCl2(dppf) because of its chelating biphosphine with a large “bite” angle18 even though β-hydride elimination cannot compete with reductive elimination in our case. The use of PdCl2(dppf) had no effect on the yield. Several bulky, electron-rich Buchwald phosphine ligands were chosen. These ligands have been shown to accelerate the oxidative addition and reductive elimination processes due to their bulky electron-rich phosphines groups.19,20 Use of these phosphine ligands and Pd(OAc)2 as the catalyst resulted in the greatest increase of the yield (Table 2). The conditions that provided the greatest yield of 50% were L2 as shown in Table 2, entry 12.

Using Table 2, entry 12 protocol we coupled a small series of isoxazoles and benzoates to show the effects of electron donating and electron withdrawing groups, as well as the versatility this protocol (Table 3). The phenylboronic acid had the highest yield with 75% for the benzoate derivative and 69% for the isoxazole derivative. Electron withdrawing groups such as 4-trifluorobenzeneboronic acid had the lowest yields with 35% and 20%. As expected, better yields were obtained with electron donating groups like 4-methoxybenzene boronic acid. Although the 4-methoxybenzene boronic acid would be expected to have a much higher yield compared to the 3-methoxybenzeneboronic acid, yet the 4-methoxybenzeneboronic acid only had a slightly better yield then the 3-methoxybenzeneboronic acid. This can be attributed to the boronic acids being used as the 4-methoxybenzeneboronic acid was of much lower purity than the 3-methoxybenzeneboronic acid as determined by NMR analysis (data not shown). Comparable moderate to good yields were obtained in the benzyl bromide series.

Table 3.

Cross-Coupling of Benzylic Bromides with Arylboronic Acids. a

graphic file with name nihms321569u3.jpg
graphic file with name nihms321569t1.jpg
1 (50.4%)
graphic file with name nihms321569t2.jpg
2 (60.9%)
graphic file with name nihms321569t3.jpg
3 (68.9%)
graphic file with name nihms321569t4.jpg
4 (20.1%)
graphic file with name nihms321569t5.jpg
5 (63.0%)
graphic file with name nihms321569t6.jpg
6 (66.7%)
graphic file with name nihms321569t7.jpg
7 (74.6%)
graphic file with name nihms321569t8.jpg
8 (34.7%)
a

Reaction conditions: boronic acid (1.5 mmol), bromide (1.0 mmol), K2CO3 (3.0 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), L2 (10 mol %), DMF (2 mL), 140°C, 20 minutes. Isolated yields are shown.

The current protocol is superior to two other routes to C5 aryl methyl isoxazoles we had previously investigated: (1) the analogous Stille coupling suffers from the limitation of handling the relatively unstable and toxic stannyl methylene isoxazoles21 and (2) nucleophilic addition of lithioalkyl isoxazoles to arene cyclopentadienyl iron cation complexes followed by oxidation22 proceeds in moderate overall yields23.

To conclude, few examples of Suzuki couplings at a benzylic position and even less with heteroaromatic rings such as isoxazoles have been described in the literature. Our study provides a protocol for achieving benzylic Suzuki coupling with moderate to good yields. Our study also provides a method that is useful for the synthesis of water sensitive compounds using a catalyst system commercially available. Furthermore, our method is quick and versatile with these findings; the synthesis of new class of water sensitive isoxazoles was possible. Our study allowed us to obtain the desired compounds to explore the SARs in this series.

Supplementary Material

01

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Buchwald phosphine ligands

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH grant P30-NS055022.

Footnotes

Supplementary Data

Experimental procedures for synthesis, characterization data of new compounds, and 1H and 13C NMR spectra for all compounds prepared can be found at doi:.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and notes

  • 1.Lo M, Wang YZ, Gout PW. J Cell Physiol. 2008;215:593–602. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Savaskan NE, Eyüpoglu IY. Ann Anat. 2010;192:309–313. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2010.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Moran MM, McFarland K, Melendez RI, Kalivas PW, Seamans JK. J Neurosci. 2005;25:6389–6393. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1007-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kaleeba JAR, Berger EA. Science. 2006;311:1921–1924. doi: 10.1126/science.1120878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bridges CC, Kekuda R, Wang H, Prasad PD, Mehta P, Huang W, Smith SB, Ganapathy V. Invest Ophth Vis Sci. 2001;42:47–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shih AY, Erb H, Sun X, Toda S, Kalivas PW, Murphy TH. J Neurosci. 2006;26:10514–10523. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3178-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Patel SA, Rajale T, O’Brien E, Burkhart DJ, Nelson JK, Twamley B, Blumenfeld A, Szabon-Watola MI, Gerdes JM, Bridges RJ, Natale NR. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010;18:202–213. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kuwano R, Yokogi M. Org Lett. 2005;7:945–947. doi: 10.1021/ol050078q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McLaughlin M. Org Lett. 2005;7:4875–4878. doi: 10.1021/ol0517271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Burns MJ, Fairlamb IJS, Kapdi AR, Sehnal P, Taylor RJK. Org Lett. 2007;9:5397–5400. doi: 10.1021/ol702291r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Molander GA, Elia MD. J Org Chem. 2006;71:9198–9202. doi: 10.1021/jo061699f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chowdhury S, Georghiou PE. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:7599–7603. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Inés B, Moreno I, SanMartin R, Domínguez E. J Org Chem. 2008;73:8448–8451. doi: 10.1021/jo8016633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Burkhart DJ, Zhou P, Blumenfeld A, Twamley B, Natale NR. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:8039–8046. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Giovannoni MP, Cesari N, Vergelli C, Graziano A, Biancalani C, Biagini P, Ghelardini C, Vivoli E, Dal Piaz V. J of Med Chem. 2007;50:3945–3953. doi: 10.1021/jm070161e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen J, Cammers-Goodwin A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:1503–1506. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zou G, Reddy YK, Falck JR. ChemInform. 2002;33 [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Brown JM, Cooley NA. Organometallics. 1990;9:353–359. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wolfe JP, Buchwald SL. Angew Chem Int Edit. 1999;38:2413–2416. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(19990816)38:16<2413::aid-anie2413>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wolfe JP, Tomori H, Sadighi JP, Yin J, Buchwald SL. J Org Chem. 2000;65:1158–1174. doi: 10.1021/jo991699y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.(a) Balasubramaniam TN. PhD Dissertation. University of Idaho; 1993. [Google Scholar]; (b) Natale NR, Mirzaei YR. Org Prep Proced Intl. 1993;25:515–556. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cambie RC, Janssen SJ, Rutledge PS, Woodgate PD. J Organometallic Chem. 1989;359:C14–C16. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.(a) Stenzel JR. PhD Dissertation. University of Idaho; 1995. [Google Scholar]; (b) Stenzel JR, Natale NR. 210th ACS National Meeting; Chicago. 1995. p. Abstract ORGN 398. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES