Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 29.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2010 Aug 15;90(3):312–318. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181e49b9f

TABLE 2. Cox multivariable analysis of risk factors for graft loss.

Variablea Hazard ratio 95% CI P
Payback vs. local >0MM 0.888 0.64–1.24 0.48
Shipped 0MM vs. local >0MM 0.718 0.55–0.95 0.019
DCD vs. DBD 0.926 0.77–1.10 0.45
Donor age (yr) 1.007 0.99–1.03 0.52
Recipient age (yr) 0.951 0.92–0.98 0.002
Transplant No. 1.128 0.95–1.34 0.17
Peak PRA (CDC) 1.005 1.001–1.008 0.005
Cold storage time (hr) 1.008 0.99–1.02 0.16
Total preservation time(hr) 0.996 0.98–1.009 0.53
Nondiabetic vs. diabetes mellitusb 0.661 0.54–0.805 <0.001
Recipient race: other vs. white 1.261 1.012–1.570 0.041
Donor race: other vs. white 0.841 0.590–1.198 0.34
Recipient BMI (kg/m2) 1.012 0.997–1.028 0.12
ESRD duration (mo) 0.995 0.987–1.003 0.21
CNI, cyclosporine vs. none 0.323 0.26–0.402 <0.001
CNI, tacrolimus vs. none 0.358 0.279–0.459 <0.001
Transplant year 1.001 0.966–1.039 0.92
a

“A vs. B” should be interpreted as hazard ratio of A relative to B.

b

Includes both types 1 and 2 diabetes.

CI, confidence interval; 0MM, 0-mismatch; DCD, donation after cardiac death; DBD, donation after brain death; PRA, panel reactive antibodies; CDC, complement-dependent cytotoxicty; BMI, body mass index; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; ESRD, end-stage renal disease.