Table 3.
Comparison of weeks exceeding threshold levels at each of the 13 rural health centres
| Rural health centre | Weeks above threshold | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2010 | Overall (August 2008 through February 2011) |
|||
| Low transmission seasons | High transmission seasons | Total | |||
| Floodplain Zone: | |||||
| Chitongo | 9 (19.6%) | 1 (1.9%) | 5 (9.1%) | 13 (19.1%) | 18 (14.6%) |
| Transitional Zone: | |||||
| Mapanza | 12 (24.0%) | 2 (4.0%) | 2 (3.5%) | 15 (22.1%) | 17 (13.6%) |
| Simaubi | 9 (52.9%) | 6 (12.0%) | 1 (2.7%) | 17 (34.7%) | 18 (20.9%) |
| Chilalantambo | 17 (36.2%) | 16 (32.0%) | 21 (38.9%) | 16 (27.1%) | 37 (32.7%) |
| Nalube | 13 (27.7%) | 7 (15.6%) | 8 (15.1%) | 13 (21.0%) | 21 (18.3%) |
| Heartland Zone: | |||||
| Mangunza | 2 (7.1%) | 19 (40.0%) | 7 (18.9%) | 17 (27.0%) | 24 (24.0%) |
| Moobola | 7 (24.1%) | 2 (3.9%) | 1 (3.1%) | 10 (15.6%) | 11 (11.5%) |
| Macha | 11 (21.2%) | 9 (17.3%) | 13 (21.3%) | 13 (21.0%) | 26 (21.1%) |
| Chilala | 8 (20.0%) | 1 (2.5%) | 2 (3.8%) | 8 (17.4%) | 10 (10.2%) |
| Siabunkululu | 13 (29.5%) | 6 (15.4%) | 7 (12.1%) | 15 (34.9%) | 21 (20.8%) |
| Habulile | 18 (35.3%) | 13 (28.9%) | 7 (12.3%) | 30 (47.9%) | 37 (30.6%) |
| Mbabala | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (4.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (3.4%) | 2 (1.7%) |
| Kamwanu | 15 (42.9%) | 15 (35.7%) | 2 (6.3%) | 28 (54.9%) | 30 (36.1%) |
* Figures are number of weeks above the threshold in the surveillance period. In parenthesis is the percentage of weeks above the threshold out of those weeks with data available.