Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 13;469(11):3022–3030. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1971-2

Table 4.

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of our proposed criteria using the results of each existing criteria set as the gold standard

Criteria set Scenario True-negative True-positive False-negative False-positive Total Sensitivity Specificity* Accuracy
1 A 0 92 80 0 172 54% 54%
B 80 87 0 5 172 100% 94% 97%
C 0 87 0 0 87 100% 100%
2 A 69 92 5 0 166 95% 100% 97%
B 80 87 0 5 172 100% 94% 97%
C 69 87 0 0 156 100% 100% 100%
3 80 85 0 7 172 100% 92% 96%
4 A 0 92 80 0 172 54% 54%
B 80 78 0 14 172 100% 85% 92%
C 0 78 0 0 78 100% 100%
5 A 74 87 1 5 167 99% 94% 96%
B 80 44 0 44 168 100% 65% 74%
C 74 44 0 5 123 100% 94% 96%
6 A 43 34 0 45 122 100% 49% 63%
B 43 11 0 66 120 100% 39% 45%
C 43 11 0 45 99 100% 49% 55%
Surgeon judgment 80 84 0 8 172 100% 91% 95%

* Specificity could not be calculated for some criteria sets in scenarios that provide zero true-negative results because of the exclusion of the results due to indeterminate findings or because all results for these criteria sets in that scenario were positive.