Table 6.
Study | Method | Number of patients | Pelvic Outcome Score | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clinical symptoms | Radiologic evaluation of reduction | Social reintegration | |||
Krappinger et al. [19] | Minimally invasive transiliac plate osteosynthesis | 31 | Very good 34%, | Very good 51%, | Complete 39%, |
good 39%, | good 29%, | incomplete 43%, | |||
fair 17%, | fair 16%, | poor 18% | |||
poor 10% | poor 4% | ||||
Kabak et al. [17] | Anterior plate osteosynthesis | 40 | Very good 78%, | ||
good 17%, | |||||
fair 5%, | |||||
poor 0% | |||||
Lindahl and Hirvensalo [22] | Iliosacral screws and/or anterior plate osteosynthesis | 101 | Very good 67%, | Very good 65%, | |
good 16%, | good 25%, | ||||
fair 16%, | fair 10%, | ||||
poor 1% | poor 0% | ||||
Fuechtmeier et al. [11] | Minimally invasive transiliac internal fixator | 31 | Very good 20%, | Very good 40%, | Complete 40%, |
good 30%, | good 60%, | incomplete 40%, | |||
fair 50%, | fair 0%, | poor 20% | |||
poor 0%, | poor 40% | ||||
Hao et al. [15] | Minimally invasive posterior plate osteosynthesis | 21 | Very good or | Very good or | |
good 90%, | good 85%, | ||||
fair 10%, | fair or | ||||
poor 0% | poor 15% | ||||
Current study | Minimally invasive transiliac internal fixator | 67 | Very good 37%, | Very good 73%, | Complete 45%, |
good 31%, | good 25%, | incomplete 36%, | |||
fair 24%, | fair 0%, | poor 19% | |||
poor 8%, | poor 2% |