Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stroke. 2011 Sep 1;42(10):2990–2994. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.620765

Table 3.

Sample size comparison between Z-test in a fixed design and the adjusted test in a two-stage design with internal pilot (with n1 = 30, 15 respectively). The total sample size (per arm) is calculated to achieve 80% power under a 20-percentage-point effect size at 5% significance (one-sided).

Placebo rate 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Z-test 49 57 64 70 74 76 77
Adjusted test (n1 = 30) 50 58 66 71 75 78 79
Adjusted test (n1 = 15) 51 63 72 79 85 88 89