Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Oct;63(10):1357–1364. doi: 10.1002/acr.20526

Table 2.

Baseline differences in functioning according to obesity (n = 716)

Obese (BMI ≥ 30)
Obese (BMI ≥ 26.8)
Unadjusted
Adjusted
Unadjusted
Adjusted
No
(N = 517)
Yes
(n = 199)
Difference p§ β (p) No
(N = 425)
Yes
(n = 291)
Difference p§ β (p)
SF-36 PF * 41.7
(12.1)
32.5
(11.0)
−9.2 <.0001 −4.2
(<.0001)
42.6
(12.0)
34.1
(11.4)
−8.5 <.0001 −4.3
(<.0001)
VLA mean
difficulty*
0.74
(0.65)
1.10
(0.60)
+0.36 <.0001 0.08
(.03)
0.71
(0.64)
1.03
(0.64)
+0.32 <.0001 0.09
(.001)
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)
Currently
employed
53.4
(250)
38.2
(68)
+15.2 .0006 0.8
(0.5, 1.3)
55.3
(214)
40.2
(104)
+15.1 .0002 0.8
(0.5, 1.1)
*

mean (SD)

% (n). Includes only women younger than age 65 at baseline (n = 646).

§

p-value from t-test or chi-square analysis comparing obese yes/no.

Adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, education, household income, marital status, disease duration, smoking, glucocorticoid use, SLAQ score, depression, and comorbid conditions in multivariate linear or logistic regression analyses.

Note: Bolded values represent statistically significant differences between obese/non-obese