Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 15.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem. 2011 Aug 25;19(20):6077–6086. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.08.040

Table 1.

The estimated binding energies (ΔGbind in kcal/mol) and experimentally determined actual inhibitory activity of the 21 compounds selected from the virtual screening. Standard Deviation of ΔGbind is in parentheses.

Compound ΔGbind (Calc.) Inhibition % at 10 μMa IC50 (μM)
3 −42.93 (±1.21) 83% 3.5
4 −31.14 (±0.98) 83% 4.6
5 −46.32 (±1.10) 45% -
6 −46.02 (±1.11) 20% -
7 −45.00 (±0.89) 38% -
8 −42.17 (±1.30)) 15% -
9 −40.34 (±1.14) 26% -
10 −37.32 (±0.97) 28% -
11 −36.98 (±1.11) 43% -
12 −36.06 (±1.13) 31% -
13 −34.33 (±1.10) 34% -
14 −32.28 (±1.00) 50% -
15 −32.27 (±1.21) 40% -
16 −31.12 (±1.13) 41% -
17 −29.15 (±1.24) 39% -
18 −28.97 (±1.27) 10% -
19 −28.60 (±0.98) 12% -
20 −28.28 (±1.28) 36% -
21 −27.84 (±1.21) 45% -
22 −25.94 (±1.13) 16% -
23 −19.35 (±1.15) 39% -
a

The inhibition was based on the measured decrease in the concentration of the produced reaction product.