Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 31.
Published in final edited form as: Am Heart J. 2009 Feb;157(2):384–390. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.10.008

Table 3.

Relative risk [RR] and 95% confidence intervals [CI] of CHD according to Lipoprotein Lipase S447X genotype in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS), the Health Professionals Follow Up Study (HPFS), and the Diet, Cancer and Health (DCH) study.*

MAF (%) N (cases/controls) Relative risk
Cases Control SS SX XX SS SX XX SX/XX
NHS 7.4 12.1 211/379 33/100 1/6 1.0 (ref) 0.57 (0.36–0.90) 0.31 (0.04–2.82) 0.56 (0.36–0.87)
HPFS 8.5 12.0 216/406 40/99 2/10 1.0 (ref) 0.73 (0.49–1.10) 0.37 (0.08–1.69) 0.70 (0.47–1.04)
DCH women 8.1 10.5 193/638 35/142 1/12 1.0 (ref) 1.02 (0.65–1.61) 0.38 (0.05–2.98) 0.97 (0.62–1.52)
DCH men 8.9 9.2 606/745 123/157 4/5 1.0 (ref) 0.89 (0.67–1.18) 1.14 (0.29–4.45) 0.89 (0.67–1.18)

Pooled 1.0 (ref) 0.77 (0.58–1.03) 0.53 (0.29–0.97) 0.74 (0.56–1.00)
*

Conditional logistic regression models were run in NHS and HPFS data (stratified by matching factors). Cox proportional hazard regression models in DCH. All models adjusted for age, smoking, alcohol intake, body mass index, and menopausal status among women.

Minor allele frequency

Meta-analysis using random effects. P for tests of between study heterogeneity: SX: 0.7; XX: 0.13; dominant (SX/XX): 0.12.