Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 30;2:236. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00236

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Average percentage of overlap of significant regions between all pairs of ERSP method for 14 subjects. The method for computing percentage of overlap is indicated in the text. (A) Bar chart of the percentage of overlap between the significant regions of ERSP using classical baseline correction and ERSP using single-trial correction. Error bars show the SE of the mean. (B) Overlap of ERSP significant regions for the baseline permutation statistical method. (C) Overlap of significant regions for the bootstrap random polarity inversion statistical method.