Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 1;85(4):586–593. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0668

Table 5.

Percentage of blood-feeding Anopheles gambiae collected in IRS and LLIN arms by pyrethrum spray catch and in exit windows traps before and after interventions, Benin*

Location Before intervention (May–July 2008) After intervention (May–July 2009) Comparison of blood feeding rate before and after intervention
Total No. fed Blood-feeding rate, % Total No. fed Blood-feeding rate, %
Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI
Adjohoun
IRS arm 84 44 52.38 50.37–53.63 32 11 34.3 4.10–64.40 P < 0.05
LLIN arm 91 61 66.7 61.90–71.44 72 20 33.3 19.79–46.88 P < 0.05
Dangbo
IRS arm 84 46 54.3 50.37–58.30 48 8 16.5 –34.82 to 66.82 P < 0.05
LLIN arm 82 57 70.2 62.05–78.28 100 22 22 18.35–25.30 P < 0.05
Misserete 1
IRS arm 84 43 50.7 44.86–56.48 5 2 41.5 –66.50 to 149.50 P < 0.05
Misserete 2
LLIN arm 288 180 62.2 58.11–66.23 4 2 50 50.00–50.00 P < 0.05
Seme
IRS arm 388 213 54.3 43.74–64.93 0 0
LLIN arm 90 52 58.3 49.19–67.47 216 152 72.3 57.13–87.54 P < 0.05
Akron control
IRS control 88 52 61.7 49.86–73.48 132 80 60 50.20–69.80 P > 0.05
LLIN control 404 264 64.3 56.69–71.98 384 200 54.7 43.87–65.46 P > 0.05
*

IRS = indoor residual spraying; LLIN = long-lasting insecticide-impregnated net (Permanet 2.0, Vestergaard Frandsen, Lausanne, Switzerland); CI = confidence interval.