Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 1;85(4):782–789. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.11-0187

Table 4.

Patient characteristics associated with poor adherence (N = 488)

Characteristic Adherence Bivariate analysis OR (95% CI) or P value Full model
Age (mean) Poor adherence, 37.8 P = 0.58
Good, 38.3
Gender (1 = male) % Poor
Men, 34.5% 0.67 (0.46–0.97) 0.70 (0.43–1.14)
Women, 44.2%
Marital status (1 = married) % Poor
Married, 38.2 1.08 (0.66–1.77) 1.04 (0.78–1.92)
Widowed, 45.1 0.56 (0.27–1.16) 0.36 (0.13–1.01)
Never, 25.5 2.10 (1.16–3.81) 0.56 (0.26–1.22)
Divorced, 59.3
Education Poor adherence, 6.4 P < 0.001 0.96 (0.89–1.03)
(mean years) Good, 7.8
Community disclosure (1 = voluntary) % Poor
Yes, voluntary 31.3 0.55 (0.24–1.30) 0.79 (0.31–2.02)
Do not know, 21.4 1.86 (1.02–3.38) 1.22 (0.97–4.23)
No, 44.2 1.31 (0.48–3.62) 1.08 (0.23–4.54)
Yes, forced 41.7
Wealth (mean US$) Poor $838 P = 0.0075 1.00 (0.9998–1.0001)
Good $1237
Has clinic buddy Poor, 62.1% 2.00 (1.38–2.89)
Good, 45.0%
HIV clinic access Poor, 124 min. 1.00 (0.998–1.003)
Travel time required (median) Good, 103 P = 0.016
Travel cost per visit (median US$) Poor, $1.97 P = 0.07
Good, $2.04
Food insecure Poor, 51.3% 1.68 (1.17–2.43) 1.08 (0.68–1.70)
Good, 38.5%
ARV side effects Poor, 67.6% 2.63 (1.78–3.90) 2.49 (1.54–4.03)
Good, 32.4%
IHDS (mean) Poor, 8.6 P = 0.001 0.97 (0.88–1.08)
Good, 9.3
zMMSE (mean score) Poor, 21.2 P = 0.001
Good, 21.9
Shona EQ-5D (mean) Poor, 8.2 P = 0.09
Good, 7.7
Stigma score (mean) Poor, 0.56 P = 0.34
Good, 0.47

Full Model: Adherence (poor = 1) = gender + marital status + years of education + community disclosure status + mean wealth + travel time + food insecurity + ARV side effects + IHDS.