Table 2. Tajima's D and Fay and Wu's H statistics per fragment per population.

Fragment	Tajima's Da							Fay and Wu′s Hb
	ASIA	EUR1	IB	SI	DU	LR	All	ASIA	EUR1	IB	SI	DU	LR	All
1	1.53	−1.14	−1.03	1.33	1.25	1.51	1.38	0.24	−4.13**	−4.78***	−0.84	−0.64	0.44	−2.77*
2	—c	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
3	−0.85	—	—	—	—	—	−1.32	0.58	—	—	—	—	—	0.16
4 (IMPA)	0.67	1.11	−1.04	−1.11	0.95	1.70	0.46	0.66	−0.33	−0.56	0.39	−0.77	0.26	0.31
5	0.22	−1.56	0.02	−1.67	—	0.46	−0.25	0.43	−1.39	−1.16	−0.98	—	−0.31	−0.21
6.(FABP4)	1.20	−0.43	1.89*	0.33	0.57	—	1.37	0.15	−1.37	0.45	0.61	−1.72	—	−0.48
7.	0.22	1.03	—	1.03	0.55	1.45	2.2*	0.76	−1.80	—	−1.80	−2.52	−1.01	−0.83
8 (FABP5)	—	−1.11	—	0.33	—	—	−0.89	—	0.39	—	0.61	—	—	0.16
9	1.9*	−1.11	—	—	—	—	−0.92	−0.06	0.39	—	—	—	—	−4.39**
10	−0.90	0.93	1.60	1.23	1.55	0.46	0.98	−0.03	0.16	−0.80	−1.29	0.51	−0.31	0.29
11 (ZNF)	−0.85	—	—	—	0.54	—	−0.97	0.58	—	—	—	0.61	—	0.30
12	0.85	0.70	1.76	1.84*	0.82	−0.81	1.37	0.20	0.60	0.30	0.00	−1.80	−2.34	0.60
13 (ZBTB)	1.82*	0.02	—	0.02	1.76	—	1.41	−0.31	−1.16	—	−1.16	−0.09	—	−0.92
All	0.67	0.22	0.87	0.52	1.29	1.06	0.83	0.23	−1.22	−1.13	−1.20	−1.32	−0.65	−1.39

^aTajima's D.

^bFay and Wu's H normalized (Zeng et al., 2006).

^cNot able to calculate because of lack of segregating sites. Nominal significance values are indicated by asterisks: ^*P<0.05; ^**P<0.01; ^***P<0.001.