Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 28.

Published in final edited form as: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2011 Aug 26;3(9):3316–3324. doi: 10.1021/am2004366

A) Plot showing 785 nm laser power dependent cell viability for hybrid nanomaterials and its comparison to only GNPOP and only SWCNT. They have been exposed to785 nm laser for 10 minutes in each case. We have used 100 µg/mL SWCNT, 100 µg/mL hybrid SWCNT and 1.5 nM GNPOP, to make sure that the amount of GNPOP is the same for SWCNT hybrid and only nanoparticle. B) Plot showing cell viability measurement when S-6 aptamer attached hybrid nanomaterial conjugated SK-BR-3, MDA-MB and HaCaT cells were treated using 1.5 W/cm² 785 nm light for 15 minutes. C) Plot showing photothermal heating curves during therapy process, when 785 nm laser with 1.5 W/cm² power has been exposed for 15 minutes.

A) Plot showing 785 nm laser power dependent cell viability for hybrid nanomaterials and its comparison to only GNPOP and only SWCNT. They have been exposed to785 nm laser for 10 minutes in each case. We have used 100 µg/mL SWCNT, 100 µg/mL hybrid SWCNT and 1.5 nM GNPOP, to make sure that the amount of GNPOP is the same for SWCNT hybrid and only nanoparticle. B) Plot showing cell viability measurement when S-6 aptamer attached hybrid nanomaterial conjugated SK-BR-3, MDA-MB and HaCaT cells were treated using 1.5 W/cm² 785 nm light for 15 minutes. C) Plot showing photothermal heating curves during therapy process, when 785 nm laser with 1.5 W/cm² power has been exposed for 15 minutes.