Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2011 Aug 3;11(10):2132–2143. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03640.x

Table 3.

Cox Proportional Hazard modeling for risk of rejection, all groups (N=587).

CMR AMR
p HR p HR
Donor Sensitized vs Unsensitized 0.016 1.87 <0.0001 4.90
Sensitized, pk PRA>0 vs Unsensitized 0.030 1.59 0.720 1.15
Sensitized, pk PRA=0 vs Unsensitized 0.757 0.94 0.316 0.69
Donor Source (living vs deceased) 0.678 0.93 0.636 0.87
African American Yes vs No 0.265 1.36 0.807 0.88
Female vs Male 0.834 1.03 0.052 1.71
Recipient age <18 vs 18–50 0.134 1.37 0.068 1.77
Recipient age >50 vs 18–50 0.004 0.61 0.007 0.40
HLA ABDR Mismatch 3–6 vs 0–2 0.001 1.86 0.001 5.00
Dialysis <180 days vs None 0.984 1.00 0.798 1.10
Dialysis >180 days vs None 0.167 1.29 0.846 1.06

pk=peak, PRA=panel reactive antibody.