Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Biol. 2011 Aug 10;8(5):055002. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/5/055002

Figure 9. Expression variability depends on the mode of translational repression by miRNA.

Figure 9

Comparison of the different effects on the noise of the two negative feedback schemes. A. Time evolution of the mean TF values for sequestration (black curves) and kinetic suppression model (gray). B. Histogram of the steady state TF distribution for the sequestration model (black) and for the kinetic suppression model (gray). The parameters are αm = 1.1, γm = γμ = 0.01, γp = 0.001, σ = 1.0, kp = 0.1, kd = 100.0, κ = 1.0, β = 0.00087. κ and β are chosen so that their mean TF values are almost the same in both models. In the sequestration model, < p >= 1174.6, δp2p=57.34, However, in the kinetic suppression model, < p >= 1176.2, δp2p=5.41. Thus, in K model, both signal and noise are suppressed; while in S model, signal is suppressed, however, noise are amplified.