Table 1.
POTATO | NLA | NLC | NVA | NVC | HLA | HLC | HVA | HVC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLA | 100 | 69 | 74 | 65 | 77 | 67 | 63 | 55 |
NLC | 100 | 61 | 69 | 63 | 84 | 52 | 62 | |
NVA | 100 | 77 | 66 | 60 | 79 | 66 | ||
NVC | 100 | 58 | 67 | 67 | 82 | |||
HLA | 100 | 71 | 70 | 60 | ||||
HLC | 100 | 58 | 74 | |||||
HVA | 100 | 72 | ||||||
HVC | 100 |
GRAPEVINE | NL | NV | HL | HV | SL | SV | NeL | NeV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NL | 100 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 66 | 70 | 66 |
NV | 100 | 79 | 89 | 78 | 89 | 88 | 89 | |
HL | 100 | 83 | 95 | 83 | 86 | 83 | ||
HV | 100 | 82 | 92 | 89 | 92 | |||
SL | 100 | 82 | 84 | 82 | ||||
SV | 100 | 91 | 100 | |||||
NeL | 100 | 91 | ||||||
NeV | 100 |
MOUSE | NL | NV | HL | HV | SL | SV | NeL | NeV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NL | 100 | 80 | 65 | 73 | 69 | 74 | 83 | 71 |
NV | 100 | 63 | 83 | 70 | 84 | 64 | 79 | |
HL | 100 | 66 | 83 | 68 | 66 | 69 | ||
HV | 100 | 75 | 92 | 64 | 87 | |||
SL | 100 | 75 | 67 | 78 | ||||
SV | 100 | 68 | 85 | |||||
NeL | 100 | |||||||
NeV | 100 |
Pairwise comparisons of the number of genes, present in the top 100 genes list that showed evidence for differential expression under different data analysis conditions. Combinations of all background correction (N—none, H—half and for grapevine, also S—subtract and Ne—normexp), normalization (L—loess, V—vsn) and spot averaging for potato (A—average, C—duplicate correlation) that was done are shown.