Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep;12(3):171–182. doi: 10.1089/omi.2008.0032

Table 1.

Pairwise Comparisons

POTATO NLA NLC NVA NVC HLA HLC HVA HVC
NLA 100 69 74 65 77 67 63 55
NLC   100 61 69 63 84 52 62
NVA     100 77 66 60 79 66
NVC       100 58 67 67 82
HLA         100 71 70 60
HLC           100 58 74
HVA             100 72
HVC               100
GRAPEVINE NL NV HL HV SL SV NeL NeV
NL 100 67 67 67 67 66 70 66
NV   100 79 89 78 89 88 89
HL     100 83 95 83 86 83
HV       100 82 92 89 92
SL         100 82 84 82
SV           100 91 100
NeL             100 91
NeV               100
MOUSE NL NV HL HV SL SV NeL NeV
NL 100 80 65 73 69 74 83 71
NV   100 63 83 70 84 64 79
HL     100 66 83 68 66 69
HV       100 75 92 64 87
SL         100 75 67 78
SV           100 68 85
NeL             100  
NeV               100

Pairwise comparisons of the number of genes, present in the top 100 genes list that showed evidence for differential expression under different data analysis conditions. Combinations of all background correction (N—none, H—half and for grapevine, also S—subtract and Ne—normexp), normalization (L—loess, V—vsn) and spot averaging for potato (A—average, C—duplicate correlation) that was done are shown.