Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 31;5(2):e11. doi: 10.4081/hi.2010.e11

Table 2f. Improvement in prediction due to including both intensity and duration of smoking among current smokers in model 6.

Likelihood ratio Value Degrees of freedom P
Vs. model 1 23.5064 10 0.0090
Vs. model 2 18.9495 9 0.0256
Difference between
Two correlated C
Estimate (SE) 95% CI x2 P
Vs. model 1 0.0050 (0.0030) −0.0009, 0.0110 2.7338 0.0982
95% CI 0.0045 (0.0029) −0.0012, 0.0103 2.3760 0.1232
Estimate 95% CI Z P
NRI
 Vs. model 1 0.0440 0.0120, 0.0761 2.6845 0.0072
 Vs. model 2 0.0268 0.0073, 0.0611 −1.5365 0.1244
IDI
 Vs. model 1 0.0031 −0.00008, 0.0062 1.9101 0.0561
 Vs. model 2 0.0019 −0.0013, 0.0052 1.1773 0.2390