Table 2. Sex segregation in progenies of direct and reciprocal crosses.

Parent 1	Parent 2	Direct cross			Reciprocal cross			P-value
		F	H	GM	F	H	GM
		Mitotype AU			Mitotype Q1
AU4.4	Q1.2	1	27	0	0	10	0	1
AU3.16	Q1.1	0	5	0	0	21	0	1
AU3.22	Q1.7	3	18	5	0	29	4	0.096
		Mitotype AU			Mitotype Q9
AU4.4	Q9.8	22	3	9	1	26	1	<1e-10
AU3.16	Q9.5	5	15	1	0	15	4	0.041
AU3.22	Q9.11	12	3	3	0	3	0	0.029
		Mitotype AU			Mitotype AMB
AU4.4	AMB9	40	0	2	—	—	—	—
AU3.16	AMB13	36	1	1	0	32	0	<1e-16
AU3.22	AMB5	27	2	4	0	43	1	<1e-16
		Mitotype Q1			Mitotype Q9
Q1.1	Q9.5	0	28	1	—	—	—	—
Q1.2	Q9.8	0	30	0	0	30	2	0.492
Q1.7	Q9.11	0	34	2	0	31	1	1
		Mitotype Q1			Mitotype AMB
Q1.1	AMB13	0	30	0	2	31	3	0.122
Q1.2	AMB9	0	30	1	—	—	—	—
Q1.7	AMB5	0	26	2	0	14	1	1
		Mitotype Q9			Mitotype AMB
Q9.8	AMB9	0	22	3	4	14	0	0.013
Q9.5	AMB13	0	29	0	0	28	0	1
Q9.11	AMB5	0	19	4	0	20	3	1

Abbreviations: F, female; GM, gynomonoecious; H, hermaphrodite.

Numbers of F, H and GM individuals are given in a single row for each cross and its reciprocal. In direct crosses, parent 1 was used as mother and parent 2 as father and conversely in reciprocal crosses. Crosses were performed between three representatives of each mitotype but three crosses failed, leaving only two replicates for three mitotype combinations. Heterogeneities between direct and reciprocal crosses were tested with Fisher tests. Significant probability P-values are indicated in boldface.