Table 2. Sex segregation in progenies of direct and reciprocal crosses.
Parent 1 | Parent 2 |
Direct cross |
Reciprocal cross |
P-value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | H | GM | F | H | GM | |||
Mitotype AU |
Mitotype Q1 |
|||||||
AU4.4 | Q1.2 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
AU3.16 | Q1.1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 1 |
AU3.22 | Q1.7 | 3 | 18 | 5 | 0 | 29 | 4 | 0.096 |
Mitotype AU |
Mitotype Q9 |
|||||||
AU4.4 | Q9.8 | 22 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 26 | 1 | <1e-10 |
AU3.16 | Q9.5 | 5 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 0.041 |
AU3.22 | Q9.11 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.029 |
Mitotype AU |
Mitotype AMB |
|||||||
AU4.4 | AMB9 | 40 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — |
AU3.16 | AMB13 | 36 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 0 | <1e-16 |
AU3.22 | AMB5 | 27 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 43 | 1 | <1e-16 |
Mitotype Q1 |
Mitotype Q9 |
|||||||
Q1.1 | Q9.5 | 0 | 28 | 1 | — | — | — | — |
Q1.2 | Q9.8 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 0.492 |
Q1.7 | Q9.11 | 0 | 34 | 2 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 1 |
Mitotype Q1 |
Mitotype AMB |
|||||||
Q1.1 | AMB13 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 3 | 0.122 |
Q1.2 | AMB9 | 0 | 30 | 1 | — | — | — | — |
Q1.7 | AMB5 | 0 | 26 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 1 |
Mitotype Q9 |
Mitotype AMB |
|||||||
Q9.8 | AMB9 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 0.013 |
Q9.5 | AMB13 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 1 |
Q9.11 | AMB5 | 0 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 1 |
Abbreviations: F, female; GM, gynomonoecious; H, hermaphrodite.
Numbers of F, H and GM individuals are given in a single row for each cross and its reciprocal. In direct crosses, parent 1 was used as mother and parent 2 as father and conversely in reciprocal crosses. Crosses were performed between three representatives of each mitotype but three crosses failed, leaving only two replicates for three mitotype combinations. Heterogeneities between direct and reciprocal crosses were tested with Fisher tests. Significant probability P-values are indicated in boldface.