Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 27;22(11):2857–2867. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1484-y

Table 3.

Determinants of vitamin D status in IBD patients stratified by season

  End of summer End of winter p valuesa
Total Vitamin D deficiency <50 nmol/L Vitamin D adequacy ≥50 nmol/L Total Vitamin D deficiency <50 nmol/L Vitamin D adequacy ≥50 nmol/L Vitamin D deficiency vs. adequacy
n = 316 n = 122 n = 194 n = 281 n = 160 n = 121 Summer Winter
Oral vitamin D supplementation, n (%) 106 (33.5) 32 (26.6) 74 (38.1) 117 (43.5) 53 (34.6) 64 (55.2) 0.029 <0.001
Fatty fish intake, units/month (SD) 2.6 (2.5) 2.7 (2.8) 2.5 (2.0) 2.6 (2.2) 2.8 (2.4) 2.5 (2.0) NS NS
Outdoor activities at least 2 h a day, days/week (SD) 5.4 (2.1) 5.3 (2.1) 5.5 (2.1) 3.0 (2.5) 3.1 (2.5) 2.9 (2.5) NS NS
Recent sun holiday, n (%) 138 (44.5) 39 (33.1) 99 (51.6) 28 (10.1) 11 (7.0) 17 (14.3) <0.001 0.047
Regular solarium visits, n (%) 64 (20.6) 14 (11.9) 50 (26.0) 28 (10.1) 7 (4.5) 21 (17.6) 0.003 0.012
Serum 25OHD level, nmol/L (SD) 55.1 (16.4) 39.1 (7.8) 65.1 (11.8) 48.4 (20.0) 35.6 (11.0) 65.5 (16.0)

aStatistical analyses were performed by using a parametric test (unpaired t test) when a normal distribution was present and when in order a non-parametric test (Mann–Whitney U) to assess univariate significant associations between the stated continuous determinants and vitamin D deficiency. Categorical determinants were analysed by using Pearson’s Chi-square test (or Fisher’s exact test when expected frequencies were low). All p values >0.10 are noted as NS (non-significant). All p values between 0.5 and 0.10 are noted in order to evaluate non-significant trends associated with vitamin D deficiency

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure