Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct;55(10):4499–4505. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00630-11

Table 2.

Final meta-analyses, excluding studies with possibly considerable false resistance in the reference assaya

Assay category No. of data sets No. of resistant strainsb No. of susceptible strainsb Mean value (95% CI)
Funnel plot asymmetry (P value)
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Positive LR Negative LR DOR
PCR-DNA sequencing 20 715 877 92 (87–95) 93 (88–97) 13.8 (7.0–27.3) 0.09 (0.05–0.14) 158 (68–364) 0.07
Molecular assaysc 5 185 381 98 (93–100) 96 (87–99) 27.7 (6.6–116.4) 0.02 (0.01–0.07) 1,438 (202–10,230) 0.27
Wayne assay 27 912 1,802 91 (87–94) 97 (94–98) 27.3 (14.4–51.7) 0.09 (0.06–0.14) 296 (138–635) 0.03
a

CI, confidence interval; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; LR, likelihood ratio.

b

Based on standard phenotypic drug susceptibility testing.

c

Comprises line probe assay, microarray, branch migration inhibition, and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.