Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct;55(10):4664–4669. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00753-11

Table 2.

Factors associated with the virological response after MCT in all the study subjectsa

Characteristic Value of characteristic by treatment responseb
Bivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
MCT positive (n = 65) MCT negative (n = 25) P OR (95% CI)c P OR (95% CI)
No. of males/total no. (%) 50/65 (77) 21/25 (84) 0.464 0.635 (0.188–2.140) NAd
Age (yr) 42 (35–46) 43 (37–47) 0.677 1.009 (0.967–1.054) NA
No. treatment naïve/total no. (%) 18/65 (28) 1/25 (4) 0.036 9.191 (1.157–73.048) 0.283 3.857 (0.328–45.364)
No. infected by sexual transmission/total no. (%) 40/65 (62) 7/25 (28) 0.006 4.114 (1.505–11.250) 0.406 1.767 (0.462–6.765)
No. infected by IDUe transmission/total no. (%) 22/65 (34) 13/25 (52) 0.117 0.472 (0.185–1.206) NA
Time since diagnosis (yr) 12 (2–19) 16 (12–19) 0.068 0.944 (0.888–1.004) 0.890 1.007 (0.911–1.114)
No. HCV PCR+f/total no. (%) 22/65 (34) 9/25 (36) 0.847 0.910 (0.347–2.387) NA
CD4+ count (cells/ml) 355 (226–465) 149 (21–320) 0.001 1.006 (1.002–1.009) 0.011 1.004 (1.001–1.008)
Plasma log VL (HIV RNA copies/ml) 4.4 (3.7–4.9) 4.6 (3.5–5.2) 0.557 0.861 (0.521–1.421) NA
a

Data are for 90 subjects. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression model, and variables showing a P value of <0.1 (boldface) in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, variables with a P value of <0.05 (boldface) were considered statistically significant.

b

Values other than number (percent) are expressed as medians (interquartile ranges).

c

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

d

NA, not applicable.

e

IDU, injecting drug user.

f

PCR+, PCR positive for hepatitis C virus.