Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct;77(19):6808–6820. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00219-11

Table 2.

Influence of biodeposition treatment on the visual aspect of different types of stonea

Stone and treatment L* a* b* ΔE*
Massangis
    None 75.5 ± 2.1 2.0 ± 0.6 9.1 ± 1.2
    Biodeposition 62.8 ± 1.2 4.4 ± 0.4 16.0 ± 1.1 14.6 ± 1.6
Aubigny
    None 75.6 ± 3.0 3.5 ± 0.7 12.5 ± 1.4
    Biodeposition 64.7 ± 1.8 5.7 ± 0.5 18.1 ± 0.8 12.4 ± 2.2
Euville
    None 78.3 ± 1.0 2.6 ± 0.2 10.6 ± 0.9
    Biodeposition 69.7 ± 1.3 4.6 ± 0.5 16.3 ± 0.7 7.3 ± 1.0
Savonnières
    None 78.3 ± 2.2 2.1 ± 0.4 11.5 ± 0.7
    Biodeposition 66.4 ± 1.6 4.3 ± 0.3 16.5 ± 1.1 13.1 ± 1.8
Avesnes
    None 77.5 ± 1.9 1.7 ± 0.6 14.8 ± 1.2
    Biodeposition 70.2 ± 2.5 2.5 ± 0.6 17.5 ± 2.3 7.9 ± 2.1
a

A decrease in the L* value indicates a darkening of the surface. Increases in the a* and b* values correspond to shifts toward red and yellow, respectively. Values are means ± the standard errors of the means.