Skip to main content
. 2001 Apr 3;98(8):4558–4562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.071406098

Table 1.

Variances of allele-length distributions and numbers of alleles indicate a bottleneck and subsequent population growth in South American non-CA C. immitis

Population n Locus
Linkage disequilibria, % g ratio
621 GA37 GA1 ACJ KO3 KO7 KO1 KO9
South America§ 14 0.18 (2) 3.80 (3) 0.40 (3) 0.00 (1) 0.29 (2) 1.79 (2) 3.19 (3) 2.18 (3) 28.5 0.006*
Southern California 6 0.67* (3) 5.10 (4) 1.10 (4) 1.20* (2) 29.8* (4) 11.8* (3) 19.9* (4) 15.1* (5) 0.00 0.309
Texas 24 0.20 (2) 96.0* (7) 0.70 (4) 0.30* (2) 37.0* (5) 47.0* (4) 6.90* (4) 7.10* (5) 7.14 3.036
Arizona 31 0.20 (3) 35.9* (8) 1.10* (5) 18.0* (3) 52.0* (7) 8.00* (6) 12.5* (8) 6.60* (7) 0.00 0.903
Mexico 38 0.70* (2) 178* (11) 1.20* (5) 0.40* (3) 98.0* (11) 3.70* (5) 12.2* (8) 12.9* (11) 3.57 10.92
*

, P < 0.05 for locus variances that are significantly greater in comparisons against South American in F tests. 

The locus GAC2 is omitted, because it is monomorphic in non-CA C. immitis. 

Proportion of loci in significant linkage disequilibria after sequential Bonferroni corrections for multiple pairwise comparisons. 

§

Variances and numbers of alleles (in parentheses) within South American are shown in bold. For the interlocus g test for population expansion, significance is assessed by using the table of 0.05 significance level cutoffs published previously (22) and is shown with an asterisk. 

Northern, central, and southern Mexico populations are considered together in order to increase sample size.