Abstract
Fixed charge chemical modifications on peptides and proteins can impact the fragmentation behaviors in tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). In this study, we employed a thiol-specific cationic alkylation reagent, (4-iodobutyl)triphenylphosphonium (IBTP), to selectively modify cysteine thiol groups in mitochondrial proteome samples. Tandem mass spectrometric characteristics of butyltriphenylphosphonium (BTP)-modified peptides were evaluated by comparison to their carbamidomethylated (CAM) analogues using a quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) instrument under low energy collision-induced dissociation (CID) conditions. Introduction of the fixed charge modification resulted in the observation of peptide and fragment (bn and yn) ions with higher charge states than those observed for CAM-modified analogues. The charged BTP moiety had a significant effect on the neighboring amide bond fragmentation products. A decrease in relative abundances of the product ions at the corresponding cleavage sites was observed compared to those from the CAM-modified derivative. This effect was particularly noticeable when an Xxx-Pro bond was in the vicinity of a BTP group. We hypothesized that the presence of a phosphonium moiety will reduce the tendency for protonation of the proximal amide bonds in the peptide backbone. Indeed, calculations indicated that proton affinities of backbone amide bonds close to the modified cysteine residues were generally 20-50 kcal/mol lower for BTP-modified peptides then for the unmodified or CAM-modified analogues with the sequence motif -Ala-Cys-Alan-Ala2-, -Ala-Cys-Alan-Pro-Ala-, and -Ala-Pro-Alan-Cys-Ala-, n = 0-3. (220 words)
Keywords: Peptide fragmentation, fixed charge modification, thiol-specific modification, proline effect
Introduction
Many proteomics workflows include reduction and subsequent modification of cysteine residues with diverse derivatization reagents to enhance the efficiency of the proteolytic step necessary for achieving high sequence coverage and high confidence protein identifications [1-6]. Most cysteine alkylations are performed under denaturing conditions after a complete reduction of the disulfide linkages [2, 4]. However, in some experimental strategies, cysteine modifications are performed under nondenaturing conditions to obtain information regarding surface accessibility of specific cysteine residues or to map cysteine residues with changed reactivities [7-9]. Murphy and colleagues introduced the thiol-specific alkylation reagent (4-iodobutyl)triphenylphosphonium (IBTP) to facilitate redox state changes of thiol proteins in respiring mitochondria [10]. IBTP forms a stable thio-ether bond with cysteine via a SN2-type alkylation reaction (Scheme 1). As a lipophilic and cationic reagent, IBTP is able to penetrate the lipid bilayers and accumulated inside the mitochondria due to the large membrane potential present across the inner mitochondrial membrane. Our group has explored the use of stable isotopically-coded IBTP probes in gel-free proteomics approaches to obtain site-specific information on reactive thiol groups in mitochondrial proteins [11]. During the course of these studies we observed that the introduction of the butyltriphenylphosphonium (BTP)-moiety affected the collision-induced dissociation (CID) behaviors of BTP-modified peptides which warranted further investigations.
Scheme 1.
Modification reactions of protein thiolates with cysteine specific reagents (a) (4-iodobutyl)triphenylphosphonium (IBTP) and (b) iodoacetamide (IAM).
Use of fixed charge derivatization to improve peptide fragmentation behaviors in mass spectrometry (MS) was first reported by Watson's group [12]. This experimental strategy has been extended by several other groups with the goal to obtain simplified fragmentation patterns for highly efficient peptide sequence analyses by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) [1, 13-15]. A series of tris(2,4,6 trimethoxyphenyl)phosphonium (TMPP) analogues were used to modify the N-terminus of peptides, which resulted in the increased formation of an or bn-ions [16-20]. The TMPP-modified peptides were also used to investigate Asp-containing peptide fragmentation mechanisms [20-22]. Besides targeting the N- and/or C-termini of peptides, ‘fixed charge’ chemical reagents have been described for selectively labeling certain amino acid side chains, such as cysteine and lysine [23, 24]. In case of IBTP, a chemoselective thiol probe, the introduction of the fixed charge usually occurs at an internal position and the effect of the fixed charge on the CID behavior of peptide ions will therefore be sequence-dependent. Here, we report a comparative study of fragmentation characteristics of thiol-containing peptides modified by a BTP or a carboxyamidomethyl (CAM) group using electrospray ionization (ESI) and low energy CID conditions on a quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) instrument. We observed a significant effect on the fragmentation behaviors at cleavage sites in the vicinity of a BTP group. This influence was particularly noticeable for the cleavage of XXX-Pro bonds in proximity to the modification site.
Experimental
Materials
Iodoacetamide (IAM), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and 1, 4-diiodobutane were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Triphenylphosphine was obtained from Spectrum (Gardena, CA). Tris(2-carboxyethyl)-phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP·HCl) was from Pierce (Rockford, IL). Sequencing-grade modified trypsin was from Promega Corp. (Madison, MI). The solvents used for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were from VWR (West Chester, PA). All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Synthesis of IBTP
IBTP was synthesized as previously described [10]. Briefly, 1,4-diiodobutane (8.5 mmol, 5-fold molar excess) was reacted with triphenylphosphine (1.5 mmol) at 100 °C in the dark for 1.5 hrs. The raw product was washed with diethyl ether, and then dissolved in 5 mL dichloromethane and precipitated with 50 mL diethyl ether. The solvents were discarded after precipitation. Residual solvent was then removed under reduced pressure to give a pale yellow solid (yield 72%). IBTP was stored at -20 °C and kept from light.
Derivatization of mitochondrial thiol proteins with IBTP and IAM
The alkylation of mitochondrial proteins with IBTP was described previously [11]. Briefly, rat cardiac mitochondria were isolated according to Suh, et. al. and stored at -80 °C [25]. Aliquots of frozen mitochondria were suspended in 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.4. Mitochondria were disrupted by several freeze-thaw cycles. Protein concentration was determined by the Pierce-Coomassie protein assay. Mitochondrial protein samples were reduced using TCEP at a final concentration of 5 mM at room temperature for 30 min and then IBTP was added using a final concentration of 2 mM. Alkylation occurred at 37 °C for 1.5 hrs. The reaction solution was digested in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate with trypsin (1:40) at 37 °C overnight. The tryptic peptides were centrifuged, and the supernatant containing the BTP-modified peptides was analyzed by nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS. The modification of mitochondrial proteins with IAM followed the same procedure.
Mass spectrometry (MS)
Tryptic digests of BTP- and CAM-modified mitochondrial proteins were analyzed using a quadrupole orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Q-TOF Ultima Global, Micromass/Waters, Manchester, UK) coupled to a nanoAcquity Ultra Performance LC system (Waters, Milford, MA) using similar conditions as described in previous work [26]. The tryptic peptide mixtures were trapped and washed on a C18 nanoAcquity column (Symmetry, 5 μm, 180 μm × 20 mm) using 2% acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid at a flow of 5 μL/min for 3 min. Peptide mixtures were separated using an ethylene bridged hybrid (BEH) column (Waters, 1.7 μm, 75 μm × 150 mm) with a binary gradient consisting of 2% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid (solvent B) over 72 min. Under identical chromatographic conditions, as expected, longer retention times were observed for BTP-modified derivatives compared to their respective CAM-modified peptides (data not shown).
The ESI source of the Q-TOF mass spectrometer was operated in the positive ion mode using a spray voltage of 3.5 kV. The data-dependent MS/MS mode was used with 0.6 s survey scans and 2.4 s MS/MS scans on the three most abundant ion signals in the MS survey scan with previously selected m/z values excluded for 60 s. The collision energy for MS/MS ranged from 25-65 eV and was dynamically selected based on the charge state of precursor ion selected by the first quadrupole. Lock mass correction was performed every 30 s per scan using the doubly charged ion of Glu1-fibrinopepide B ([M + 2H]2+ 785.8426 Da, monoisotopic mass). Mass spectra were calibrated using fragment ions of Glu1-fibrinopepide B (MH+ 1570.6774 Da, monoisotopic mass). Peak list (pkl) files were generated using ProteinLynx Global Server 2.3 (PLGS, Waters, Manchester, UK).
Database searching
Mascot software (Matrix Science, London, UK) was used to facilitate the interpretation of tandem mass spectral data. MS/MS data were searched against the mammalian SwissProt database (Taxonomy rodentia) with variable peptide modifications including Met oxidation (147.04 Da, monoisotopic mass), carboxyamidomethylated Cys (160.03 Da, monoisotopic mass), and BTP-modified Cys (419.15 Da, monoisotopic mass). Trypsin/P was selected as the digesting enzyme allowing for one missed cleavage site. Mass tolerance was set to ±0.1 Da and ±0.12 Da for precursor and fragment ions, respectively. In addition, peptide identifications were confirmed by manual inspections and fragment ion annotations were added as necessary.
Calculation of proton affinities
Structures of unmodified, CAM-modified, BTP-modified peptides and their corresponding protonated peptides were optimized at the PM6 semi-empirical level of theory to identify the global minimum using software MOPAC2009™ [27]. Proton affinities (PAs) of all peptides and their derivatives were calculated according to the definition [28]. Briefly, PA equals the negative enthalpy change of a protonation reaction, Eq. 1:
| (1) |
i.e., -ΔH = PA, where, Eq. 2:
| (2) |
ΔHf is the enthalpy of formation of the respective chemical species. The heat of formation of H+ in the gas phase, ΔHf(H+), is 365.7 kcal/mol [29]. Heats of formation of all optimized structures were calculated by MOPAC2009™. For protonated peptides, the protons were placed at the N-terminal amino group of Pro (for proline-containing peptides) or Ala (for non-proline-containing peptides). Peptides with the following sequences were calculated with both CAM and BTP modifications: -Ala-Cys-Alan-Ala2-, -Ala-Cys-Alan-Pro-Ala-, and -Ala-Pro-Alan-Cys-Ala-, where n = 0-3.
Results and Discussion
Comparative tandem mass spectral study of BTP- and CAM-modified tryptic peptides derived from mitochondrial proteins
The use of IBTP reagent to selectively modify mitochondrial thiol proteins has been successfully demonstrated by our group and others [10, 11]. With the potential of being a mitochondria-targeted analytical thiol proteomics tool, we felt it was of general importance to gain a better understanding of the fragmentation behaviors of the resultant BTP-modified peptide derivatives in low energy CID experiments. For this purpose we evaluated the fragmentation patterns of peptides modified by the cationic BTP moiety and the corresponding peptides modified by the neutral carboxyamidomethyl group. The modification reactions of protein thiols with IBTP and IAM, respectively, are shown in Scheme 1.
The rat heart mitochondrial samples were treated with IBTP and IAM reagents, respectively, trypsinized and subjected to nanoLC-MS/MS using a Q-TOF instrument operated in the data-dependent acquisition mode. A comparison of the two datasets yielded nine peptide pairs for which fragmentation information was available encompassing the same cysteine residues modified by IBTP and IAM, respectively. The tandem mass fragmentation patterns of these peptides are summarized in Table 1. The majority of CAM-modified mitochondrial peptides were doubly charged ions, [M+2H]2+, with charging arising from a mobile or partially mobile proton along peptide backbone and a localized proton at the C-terminal basic residue (Arg or Lys). Consequently, most fragment ions were singly charged since no permanently charged moiety was attached to the peptides. Occasionally, doubly charged yn ions were detected with low intensity, when either a His residue was located internally in the peptide or the yn ions consisted of a relatively long partial sequence of the peptide, which can potentially carry an additional mobile proton along the backbone. In contrast, with only mono-BTP-modified tryptic peptides identified from the mitochondrial sample, the majority of BTP-modified peptides were observed as triply charged ions, [M+2H]3+, in agreement with that the phosphonium ion in BTP, a localized proton at the C-terminal Arg or Lys, and a mobile or partially mobile proton on the N-terminus of a peptide contribute to the observed charge state. Occasionally, an internal basic residue, likely a protonated His residue, may contribute an additional charge to the peptide ion (Figure S3). For the fragmentation patterns of BTP-modified peptides, the introduction of the fixed charge modification resulted in the presence of more doubly charged fragment ions in the tandem mass spectra. The location of the modified Cys residue within the peptide sequence determined the predominant types of the observed fragment ions which allowed us grouping of the peptides into three categories: (1) Peptides with Cys(BTP) residue located near the N-terminal end, i.e., Cys within the first third of the peptide, yielded MS/MS spectra in which doubly charged bn ions were noticeably visible. (2) Peptides with modified Cys residue located in the middle of the peptide, i.e., Cys within the second third of the peptide, gave MS/MS spectra in which doubly charged bn ions gradually disappeared, and instead, doubly charged yn ions started to appear. (3) Peptides with Cys(BTP) residue located near the C-terminal end, i.e., Cys within the last third of the peptide, in general, resulted in MS/MS spectra in which yn2+ fragment ions encompassing the Cys(BTP) residue were clearly displayed.
Table 1. Comparison of fragmentation patterns of BTP- and CAM-modified peptide pairs identified from mitochondrial samples.
| Cys located at | Protein name (Accession & Fig. #) | Precursor ion (m/z, z) | BTP- and CAM-modified peptides and observed fragment ions indicated |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st third of peptide (N-terminal end) | ATP synthase subunit d (P31399, Fig. 1) | 533.25, 3+ |
|
| 669.81, 2+ |
|
||
| Acyl carrier protein (NP_001099764, Fig. S1) | 651.98, 3+ |
|
|
| 847.89, 2+ |
|
||
| Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6B1 (NP_001138745, Fig. 2) | 646.31, 3+ |
|
|
| 839.37, 2+ |
|
||
| ATP synthase subunit O (Q06647, Fig. 4) | 879.13, 3+ |
|
|
| 1188.59, 2+ |
|
||
|
| |||
| 2nd third of peptide (middle) | Creatine kinase (P09605, Fig. S2) | 665.34, 3+ |
|
| 867.95, 2+ |
|
||
| Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 6 (Q5M9I5, Fig. S3) | 622.29, 4+ |
|
|
| 829.38, 3+ |
|
||
| 742.97, 3+ |
|
||
| NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein 1 (Q91YT0, Fig. S4) | 776.39, 3+ |
|
|
| 1034.50, 2+ |
|
||
| ADP/ATP translocase 1 (Q05962, Fig. 3) | 1019.19, 3+ |
|
|
| 1398.63, 2+ |
|
||
|
| |||
| Last third of peptide (C-terminal end) | ADP/ATP translocase 1 (Q05962, Fig. S5) | 756.86, 2+ |
|
| 627.27, 2+ |
|
||
indicates BTP-modified Cys residue;
marks CAM-modified Cys residue;
marks a neutral loss of water (H2O) in fragment ions
The effect of a thiol-specific fixed charge chemical modification on the fragmentation behavior of cysteine-containing peptides
The impact of the fixed charge of the phosphonium ion was observed on the proximal peptide backbone cleavages under low energy CID conditions. For instance, the peptide NCAQFVTGSQAR from ATP synthase subunit d was detected as BTP- (m/z 533.25, 3+) and CAM-modified (m/z 669.81, 2+) derivatives (Figure 1). A comparison of the fragment ion spectra revealed that although many fragment ions were observed for both peptide derivatives, the y9 and y10 ions were absent in the MS/MS spectrum of the BTP derivative. We speculated that the reduced formation of the y ions in proximity to the cationic BTP-modified residue was at least partly due to due to hampered protonation of the amide bonds in proximity to the BTP moiety caused by charge repulsion between the cationic phosphonium ion and the mobile proton. Moreover, this hypothesis was supported by differences in the relative intensities of the y7 and y8 ions. In contrast, the high intensities of the y9 and y10 ions observed for the CAM-modified analogue implied uninterrupted proton mobility along the peptide backbone in this peptide. The high intensity of the b2 ion in the protonated CAM-modified peptide fragment spectra is likely due to the relatively stable protonated oxazolone structure of the b2+ ion [30, 31]. Retention of the fixed charge on the N-terminal fragment may likely contribute to the relatively high abundance of the b2 ion in this BTP-modified peptide. However, the mechanism of formation and the structure of the b2 ion are not clear for this BTP-modified peptide ion.
Figure 1.
Tandem mass spectra of (a) BTP-modified (533.25, 3+) and (b) CAM-modified (669.81, 2+) peptide NCAQFVTGSQAR (aa 100-111) from ATP synthase subunit d acquired on an ESI Q-TOF instrument. C‡: BTP-modified Cys residue; C#: CAM-modified Cys residue.
Suppression of yn-fragment ion formation in the vicinity of the BTP-modified cysteine residue was observed in other peptides as well, including YFAGNLASGGAAGATSLCFVYPLDFAR from ADP/ATP translocase 1 (Figure 3), SQTEEDCTEELFDFLHAR from cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 6 (Figure S3), and GAGAYICGEETALIESIEGK from NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein 1 (Figure S4).
Figure 3.
ESI Q-TOF MS/MS spectra of (a) BTP-modified (m/z 1019.19, 3+) and (b) CAM-modified (m/z 1398.63, 2+) peptide YFAGNLASGGAAGATSLCFVYPLDFAR (aa 112-138) from ADP/ATP translocase 1. The fragment ion expected from preferential cleavage N-terminal to Pro, y6, is only observed in the CAM-modified derivative. C‡, BTP-modified Cys residue; C#, CAM-modified Cys residue.
Divergence from the “proline effect” in BTP-modified proline-containing thiol peptides
The present study also revealed that the charged BTP moiety caused divergent fragmentation behaviors in proline-containing peptides. Protonated proline-containing peptide ions show usually enhanced cleavage of the backbone amide bond located N-terminally to the proline residue. This experimental observation is commonly term the “proline effect”. Indeed, CAM-modified peptides exhibited fragment ion patterns that conform to this expected behavior. However, a contradictory behavior was observed for BTP-modified proline-containing peptides. The MS/MS spectra of BTP-modified peptides showed low (rather than high) intensities of yn-ions derived from the cleavage at Xxx-Pro bonds. The tryptic peptide SLCPVSWVSAWDDR from cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6b1 is a typical example. This peptide was observed with both BTP- and CAM-modifications at m/z 646.31 (3+) and m/z 839.37 (2+), respectively (Figure 2). According to the proline effect, a strong y11 fragment ion resulting from the selective cleavage of the Cys-Pro bond is expected. Indeed, the proline effect was observed for the CAM-modified derivative; a strong y11 ion is visible in the tandem mass spectrum depicted in Figure 2B. However, the y11 ion was absent in the tandem mass spectrum of the BTP-modified SLCPVSWVSAWDDR peptide (Figure 2A). The impact of the fixed charge modification extended to the y10, y9 and y8 ions as well: no y10 fragment was detected for the BTP-modified peptide, and the relative abundances of y9 and y8 ions in the BTP-modified peptide were significantly lower than those observed for the CAM-modified derivative.
Figure 2.
Tandem mass spectra of (a) BTP-modified (646.31, 3+) and (b) CAM-modified (839.37, 2+) peptide SLCPVSWVSAWDDR (aa 63-76) from cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6B1 acquired on an ESI Q-TOF instrument. The y11 ion produced as a result of preferential cleavage from the proline effect is only observed in the CAM-tagged peptide. C‡: BTP-modified Cys residue; C#: CAM-modified Cys residue.
Similar observations were also made for the following peptides listed in Table 1: LMCPQEIVDYIADK from the acyl carrier protein (Figure S1) and LGYILTCPSNLGTGLR from sarcomeric creatine kinase (Figure S2). In both cases, the BTP-derivate showed fragmentation patterns that contradicted the expected trend for proline-containing peptides indicating a least a partial suppression of the proline effect by the fixed charge modification.
The impact of a BTP moiety on the proline effect was also observed in peptides with the general sequence -Cys(BTP)-Xxxn-Pro-, where n = 1-3 (Table 2). For example, in the tryptic peptide YFAGNLASGGAAGATSLCFVYPLDFAR from ADP/ATP translocase 1, three amino acid residues are present between the cysteine and proline residue. This peptide was observed as BTP-modified (m/z 1019.19, 3+) as well as CAM-modified (m/z 1398.63, 2+) derivative (Figure 3). The fragment ion y6, associated with the proline effect at Pro-22, was the most intense fragment ion signal in the MS/MS spectrum of the CAM-modified peptide. However, the corresponding y6 ion was not observed in the BTP-modified analogue. Furthermore, the BTP moiety displayed a significant impact on the protonation of up to four successive neighboring amide bonds, i.e. none of the y ions from y6 to y9 were detected in this peptide.
Table 2. BTP-modified proline-containing mitochondrial thiol peptides.
| -Cys-(Xxx)n-Pro-or -Pro-(Xxx)n-Cys- | Protein name | Precursor ion(m/z, z) | BTP-modified Pro-containing thiol peptidea,b | Observed fragments from Xxx-Pro (Fig. #) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 0 | Acyl carrier protein (NP_001099764) | 651.98, 3+ | LM
QEIVDYIADKa
|
Suppressed y11 (Fig. S1) |
| Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6B1 (NP_001138745) | 646.31, 3+ | SL
VSWVSAWDDRa
|
No y11 (Fig. 2) | |
| Creatine kinase S-type (P09605) | 665.34, 3+ | LGYILT
SNLGTGLRa
|
Suppressed y9 (Fig. S2) | |
| Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 1 (Q68FY0) | 995.79, 3+ | YFYDQ
AVAGYG
IEQLSDYNR |
Observed all related fragments (Fig. S6) | |
| ATP synthase subunit O (Q06647) | 879.13, 3+ | GEV
TVTTAF
LDEAVLSELKa
|
Suppressed y192+ (Fig. 4) | |
| n = 1 | Thioredoxin (P0AA25) | 785.7, 3+ | ADGAILVDFWAEW
G
C#Kb
|
No y3 [11] |
| 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase (P13437) | 983.5, 3+ | VVGYFVSG
D
AIMG
V
AITGALKb
|
High y8 & y10 and no y17 [11] | |
| Cytochrome c1, heme protein (EDM15989) | 971.83, 3+ | HGGEDYVFSLLTGY
E
TGVSLR |
Low y8 & b162+(Fig. S7) | |
| n = 2 | Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP] (P56574) | 659.35, 3+ | NILGGTVFRE
II
K |
High y5 (Fig. S8) |
| n = 3 | ADP/ATP translocase 1 (Q05962) | 1019.19, 3+ | YFAGNLASGGAAGATSL
FVY
LDFARa
|
No y6, (Fig. 3) |
| Creatine kinase S-type (P09605) | 719.61, 4+ | LIDDHFLFDK
VS
LLT
AGMAR |
Moderate y102+ and high y132+ (Fig. S9) |
Peptides also identified with CAM-modification;
Peptides identified from the earlier study [11];
indicates BTP-modified Cys residue;
marks CAM-modified Cys residue
A less pronounced proline effect was also observed for peptides with a sequence of -Pro-Xxxn-Cys(BTP)-, where n = 1-3 (Table 2). For example, the peptide, GEVPCTVTTAFPLDEAVLSELK from ATP synthase subunit O, yielded fragment ion spectra for both CAM- and BTP-modified derivatives (Figure 4). The y192+ ion was detected as the base peak for the CAM-modified peptide in accord with a favored cleavage at Val-Pro bond, whereas with a much lower relative abundance in the BTP-modified analogue. Again, the product ions, y15-y17, resulting from the cleavages of amide bonds proximal to the BTP moiety, displayed all lower relative abundances in the BTP-modified analogue.
Figure 4.
Tandem mass spectra of (a) BTP-modified (m/z 879.13, 3+) and (b) CAM-modified (m/z 1188.59, 2+) peptide GEVPCTVTTAFPLDEAVLSELK (aa 137-158) from ATP synthase subunit O acquired on an ESI Q-TOF. The fragments produced from the selective cleavage N-terminal to Pro are encircled. C‡, BTP-modified Cys residue; C#: CAM-modified Cys residue; P, precursor ion.
Proton affinity calculations
The above described qualitative observations prompted us to examine to what extend the cationic BTP group affects the proton affinities of amides in peptide backbone. Proton affinities of derivatized amino acids have been calculated and experimentally measured by several groups. Their studies have pointed out the importance of hydrogen bonding for structure stabilization and the degree of charge stabilization and delocalization for the local proton affinity of an amino acid residue [32, 33]. We hypothesized that the decreased abundances of fragment ions derived from cleavages of amide bonds in the proximity of a BTP group were caused by the reduced propensity for protonation of the backbone amide in vicinity of the fixed charge phosphonium ion. Therefore, lower proton affinities at those amide bonds were expected compared to the ones in unmodified or CAM-modified analogues without influence of the charged BTP group. To support this hypothesis, we calculated proton affinities of several N-terminal amino groups close to a cysteine residue with a BTP- or CAM-modification in a set of cysteine-containing peptides: -Ala-Cys-Alan-Ala2-, where n = 0-3.
To better understand the impact of the BTP moiety on the proline effect, we also calculated the proton affinities of backbone amides in proline-containing peptides with the general sequences of -Ala-Cys-Alan-Pro-Ala- and -Ala-Pro-Alan-Cys-Ala-, where n = 0-3, and with BTP and CAM modifications in our calculations. As one of the few selective collision-induced gas-phase fragmentations observed for peptide ions, the proline effect has been under extensive investigations. Studies by many groups have let to the conclusion that the proline effect (1) results from a charge-directed peptide fragmentation pathway, i.e., cleavage is initiated by a charge (a proton) that is transferred to the vicinity of the cleavage site, i.e., a carbonyl oxygen or amino nitrogen [34]; (2) proceeds via an intermediate oxazolone structure; this pathway explains why this cleavage typically occurs N-terminal rather than C-terminal to the proline residue since C-terminal cleavage would require an unfavorable 5-5 bicyclical ring structure transition state [21, 35]; and (3) is facilitated via proton transfer governed by the PA of heteroatoms (O, N, S, etc.). The high PA of the amino group in proline may explain why yn-ions are the predominant fragment ions observed in the MS/MS spectra during low energy CID experiments of proline-containing peptides [36, 37].
In our PA calculations, all protons were placed at nitrogen atoms of backbone amide bonds. For non-proline containing thiol peptides, protonations occur more likely initially at carbonyl oxygen of the peptide backbone prior to cleavages. However, for dissociation of the amide bond under yn-formation, the predominant ions observed in our data, the proton has to be transferred to the nitrogen of the amide bonds [38]. For proline-containing peptides, the protons are likely migrate to the amino nitrogen of the proline residue due to the high basicity (or high PA). The spatial effect of a BTP moiety on PAs was also estimated by placing up to three alanine residues between a Cys(BTP) and a potonated amide site. The results of our PA calculations are summarize in Table 3 and indicate that BTP-modified peptides consistently show PAs that were 20-50 kcal/mol lower compared to the unmodified or CAM-modified analogues. This difference indicates that higher energies are required in order to protonate the amide bonds in the peptide backbone in the vicinity of a Cys(BTP) residue. With the suppressed propensities for protonating those amide bonds, reduced relative abundances of the product ions (mainly yn ions) corresponding to the cleavages at these sites are expected, which is consistent with the experimental observations made in the current study. As assumed, PAs of the BTP-modified derivatives show an increased trend when enlarging the distances between the protonation sites (Ala or Pro) and Cys(BTP) residues (n = 0 vs. n = 3). The optimized three-dimensional structures display more compact conformations for CAM-tagged and unmodified peptides, while the BTP-modified derivatives show more open structures. This is most likely due to the charge repulsion between the cationic phosphonium ion and the protonated amide bond (Figure S10).
Table 3. Proton affinities of thiol peptides with BTP or CAM modifications.
| PA (kcal/mol) | n = 0 | n = 1 | n = 2 | n = 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Pro-containing-peptide | -Ala-Cys(BTP)-Alan-Ala2- | 181.6 | 177.6 | 178.3 | 193.4 |
| -Ala-Cys(CAM)-Alan-Ala2- | 217.9 | 225.8 | 222.7 | 234.8 | |
|
| |||||
| ΔPA (BTP vs CAM) | 36.3 | 48.2 | 44.4 | 41.4 | |
|
| |||||
| Pro-containing-peptide | -Ala-Cys(BTP)-Alan-Pro-Ala- | 178.8 | 187.9 | 196.0 | 190.4 |
| -Ala-Cys(CAM)-Alan-Pro-Ala- | 218.7 | 221.9 | 216.9 | 219.7 | |
| -Ala-Cys-Alan-Pro-Ala- | 214.2 | 213.8 | 232.5 | 222.7 | |
|
| |||||
| ΔPA (BTP vs CAM) | 39.9 | 34.0 | 20.9 | 29.3 | |
|
| |||||
| -Ala-Pro-Alan-Cys(BTP)-Ala- | 182.0 | 190.2 | 187.3 | 202.0 | |
| -Ala-Pro-Alan-Cys(CAM)-Ala- | 218.2 | 233.8 | 227.9 | 232.6 | |
|
| |||||
| ΔPA(BTP vs CAM) | 36.2 | 43.6 | 40.6 | 30.6 | |
The proline effect in BTP-modified multiple-proline-containing peptides
The selective cleavages arising from specific amino acid residues in protonated peptides, i.e., Asp, His and Pro residues, have been statistically evaluated using large datasets of “real world” MS/MS spectra [39-41]. Wysocki and Yates III groups have determined the average relative cleavage ratios of Xxx-Pro bonds from a dataset of 516 peptides acquired under low energy CID conditions on an ion trap MS. The relative cleavage ratio of an Xxx-Pro bond was defined as the total relative abundance of the sum of a, b and y ions formed at the Xxx-Pro bond divided by the sum of the total ions, a, b and y, observed for that peptide. In their study, average Xxx-Pro cleavage ratios were reported for 18 combinations, however, the cleavage ratios for Cys-Pro and Met-Pro bonds were not summarized because these sequence motifs were under represented in the dataset evaluated [40]. Here, we used the average Xxx-Pro cleavage ratios reported in their study to evaluate the impact of a BTP moiety on the proline effect in peptides containing multiple proline residues.
Several BTP-modified thiol peptides identified from heart mitochondria contained multiple proline residues. The BTP moiety exerted its influences on the respective Pro residues proximate to a Cys(BTP) residue. For example, the previously mentioned peptide, GEVPCTVTTAFPLDEAVLSELK from ATP synthase subunit O, contains two Pro residues, Pro-4 and Pro-12, and was detected with BTP- and CAM-modified derivatives at m/z 879.13 (3+) and m/z 1188.59 (2+), respectively (Figure 4). The fragment ions related to the proline effect in this peptide were the singly and/or doubly charged b3/y19 and b11/y11 ions resulting from the amide bond cleavage at Val-Pro and Phe-Pro, respectively. The average cleavage ratios for those two bonds have been reported as 0.383 ± 0.223 (for Val-Pro) and 0.282 ± 0.199 (for Phe-Pro), respectively [40]. The y192+ ion was the predominant ion in the tandem mass spectrum of the CAM-modified peptide, and the higher relative intensity of y192+ ion compared to that of y11 ion is in accord with the reported cleavage ratios for those two motifs. In contrast, for the BTP-modified peptide, the relative intensities of the y192+ and y11 (and y112+) ions showed an opposite trend reflecting the impact of the BTP group on the proton affinity of proline residue at position 4.
Similarly, the fragmentation behavior observed for the BTP-modified peptide VVGYFVSGCDPAIMGIGPVPAITGALK (m/z 983.5, 3+) from acetyl-CoA-acyltransferase from our early study further underscored the impact of the fixed cationic derivatization on the cleavage propensities of the multiple Xxx-Pro bonds present in this peptide [11]. This tryptic peptide has three Pro residues and the reported average cleavage ratios for those three sites are 0.367 ± 0.235 (for Asp-Pro), 0.383 ± 0.223 (for Val-Pro) and 0.068 ± 0.071 (for Gly-Pro). But, only two Pro-related yn fragment ions, y8 and y10 (cleavages at Val-Pro and Gly-Pro), were detected with high intensities. The expected y17 ion (cleavage at Asp-Pro) was not observed although this particular amide bond is considered as an enhanced cleavage site [40]. The suppression of the y17 ion in the BTP-derivative is a strong experimental evidence of the suppressing effect of the BTP group on the protonation and fragmentation of the proximate Asp-Pro bond. Other BTP-modified multiple-proline-containing peptides and their fragmentations at the corresponding Xxx-Pro bonds are described in Table 2.
In summary, our study demonstrates the impact of the cationic BTP moiety (versus a neutral CAM group) on the fragmentation behaviors of protonated peptides under low energy CID conditions. The CID-MS/MS studies of cysteine-containing peptides generated from a biological sample revealed that a large cationic moiety in a cysteine side chain can hamper protonation of proximal amide bonds, including the Xxx-Pro bond. The decreased relative intensities of y-type fragment ions were in accord with the proposed reduced propensities of protonation at these sites. PA calculations supported our experimental observations and confirmed lower PAs for the backbone amide bonds proximal to a modified cysteine residue for BTP-modified peptides compared to the CAM-modified or unmodified analogues. For proline-containing thiol peptides, a noticeably hindered proline effect was observed in our studies. PA calculations also supported a dependence of the protonation propensities of Xxx-Pro bonds on the spatial vicinity to a Cys(BTP) residue.
Conclusions
We report a tandem mass spectrometric study of a cysteine thiol-specific charged modification applied to heart mitochondrial samples. The alkylation reagent IBTP is a lipophilic and membrane-permeable cationic probe typically used to label thiol proteins in mitochondria. The introduction of a charged moiety had a significant impact on the relative abundances of fragment ions resulting from the cleavages at proximal amide bonds of a BTP group. We speculated that a possible reason for this observation is that a large positively charged moiety in the side chain of Cys residues may interfere with protonation of neighboring amide bonds. Proton affinity calculations supported the experimental observations in the current study. Our study emphasized the effect of a charged chemical modification on peptide side chain functional groups on the proton affinities of peptide backbones and the related MS/MS fragmentation behaviors.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Valery Voinov for his generous help on the usage of the MOPAC software. This work was supported by grants from the NIH/NIA (AG025372) and the Medical Research Foundation of Oregon. The OSU EHSC mass spectrometry core facility is supported in part by a grant from NIEHS (P30 ES00210).
References
- 1.Ren D, et al. Enrichment of cysteine-containing peptides from tryptic digests using a quaternary amine tag. Anal Chem. 2004;76:4522–30. doi: 10.1021/ac0354645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sechi S, Chait BT. Modification of cysteine residues by alkylation. A tool in peptide mapping and protein identification. Anal Chem. 1998;70:5150–8. doi: 10.1021/ac9806005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lundblad RL. Chemical reagents for Protein Modification. 2nd. CRC Press; 1991. pp. 59–93. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brune DC. Alkylation of cysteine with acrylamide for protein sequence analysis. Anal Biochem. 1992;207:285–90. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90013-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Friedman M, Krull LH, Cavins JF. The chromatographic determination of cystine and cysteine residues in proteins as s-beta-(4-pyridylethyl)cysteine. J Biol Chem. 1970;245:3868–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nilsson CL, Davidsson P. New separation tools for comprehensive studies of protein expression by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2000;19:390–7. doi: 10.1002/1098-2787(2000)19:6<390::AID-MAS2>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tie JK, et al. Determination of disulfide bond assignment of human vitamin K-dependent gamma-glutamyl carboxylase by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:45468–75. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309164200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Findlay HE, McClafferty H, Ashley RH. Surface expression, single-channel analysis and membrane topology of recombinant Chlamydia trachomatis Major Outer Membrane Protein. BMC Microbiol. 2005;5:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-5-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sasaki T, et al. Dimer model for the microfibrillar protein fibulin-2 and identification of the connecting disulfide bridge. Embo J. 1997;16:3035–43. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.11.3035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lin TK, et al. Specific modification of mitochondrial protein thiols in response to oxidative stress: a proteomics approach. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:17048–56. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110797200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marley K, et al. Mass tagging approach for mitochondrial thiol proteins. J Proteome Res. 2005;4:1403–12. doi: 10.1021/pr050078k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wagner DS, et al. Derivatization of peptides to enhance ionization efficiency and control fragmentation during analysis by fast atom bombardment tandem mass spectrometry. Biol Mass Spectrom. 1991;20:419–25. doi: 10.1002/bms.1200200705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mirzaei H, Regnier F. Enhancing electrospray ionization efficiency of peptides by derivatization. Anal Chem. 2006;78:4175–83. doi: 10.1021/ac0602266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mirzaei H, Regnier F. Enrichment of carbonylated peptides using Girard P reagent and strong cation exchange chromatography. Anal Chem. 2006;78:770–8. doi: 10.1021/ac0514220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Madsen JA, Brodbelt JS. Simplifying fragmentation patterns of multiply charged peptides by N-terminal derivatization and electron transfer collision activated dissociation. Anal Chem. 2009;81:3645–53. doi: 10.1021/ac9000942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Huang ZH, et al. A picomole-scale method for charge derivatization of peptides for sequence analysis by mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 1997;69:137–44. doi: 10.1021/ac9608578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Adamczyk M, Gebler JC, Wu J. Charge derivatization of peptides to simplify their sequencing with an ion trap mass spectrometer. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1999;13:1413–22. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19990730)13:14<1413::AID-RCM657>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sadagopan N, Watson JT. Investigation of the tris(trimethoxyphenyl)phosphonium acetyl charged derivatives of peptides by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2000;11:107–19. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(99)00127-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen W, et al. Improving de novo sequencing of peptides using a charged tag and C-terminal digestion. Anal Chem. 2007;79:1583–90. doi: 10.1021/ac061670b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Herrmann KA, Wysocki VH, Vorpagel ER. Computational investigation and hydrogen/deuterium exchange of the fixed charge derivative tris(2,4,6-trimethoxyphenyl) phosphonium: implications for the aspartic acid cleavage mechanism. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2005;16:1067–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wysocki VH, et al. Mobile and localized protons: a framework for understanding peptide dissociation. J Mass Spectrom. 2000;35:1399–406. doi: 10.1002/1096-9888(200012)35:12<1399::AID-JMS86>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gu C, et al. Selective gas-phase cleavage at the peptide bond C-terminal to aspartic acid in fixed-charge derivatives of Asp-containing peptides. Anal Chem. 2000;72:5804–13. doi: 10.1021/ac000555c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ueberheide BM, et al. Rapid sensitive analysis of cysteine rich peptide venom components. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:6910–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900745106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhou X, et al. ‘Fixed charge’ chemical derivatization and data dependant multistage tandem mass spectrometry for mapping protein surface residue accessibility. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2010;21:1339–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2010.03.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Suh JH, Heath SH, Hagen TM. Two subpopulations of mitochondria in the aging rat heart display heterogenous levels of oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2003;35:1064–72. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(03)00468-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chavez J, et al. New role for an old probe: affinity labeling of oxylipid protein conjugates by N'-aminooxymethylcarbonylhydrazino d-biotin. Anal Chem. 2006;78:6847–54. doi: 10.1021/ac0607257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stewart JJ. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods V: modification of NDDO approximations and application to 70 elements. J Mol Model. 2007;13:1173–213. doi: 10.1007/s00894-007-0233-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hoffmann ED, Stroobant V. Mass spectrometry principles and applications. 2nd. Wiley; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 29.NIST. Gas-phase ion thermochemistry. in http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/ion/#PA.
- 30.Perkins BR, et al. Evidence of diketopiperazine and oxazolone structures for HA b2+ ion. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:17528–9. doi: 10.1021/ja9054542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Paizs B, et al. Formation of b2+ ions from protonated peptides: an ab initio study. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1999;13:525–533. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(20000515)14:9<746::AID-RCM939>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Addario V, et al. Proton affinities of methyl esters of N-acetylated amino acids. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2002;219:101–114. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lioe H, et al. Experimental and theoretical proton affinities of methionine, methionene sulfoxide and their N- and C-terminal derivatives. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2007;267:220–232. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wysocki VH, et al. Principles of mass spectrometry applied to biomolecules, chapter 8, peptide fragmentation overview. Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2006. pp. 279–300. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Grewal RN, et al. Fragmentation of Protonated Tripeptides: The Proline Effect Revisited. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:4899–4908. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Paizs B, Suhai S. Fragmentation pathways of protonated peptides. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2005;24:508–48. doi: 10.1002/mas.20024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wysocki VH, et al. Mass spectrometry of peptides and proteins. Methods. 2005;35:211–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kenny PT, Nomoto K, Orlando R. Fragmentation studies of peptides: the formation of y ions. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1992;6:95–7. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1290060205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Huang Y, et al. Statistical characterization of the charge state and residue dependence of low-energy CID peptide dissociation patterns. Anal Chem. 2005;77:5800–13. doi: 10.1021/ac0480949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Breci LA, et al. Cleavage N-terminal to proline: analysis of a database of peptide tandem mass spectra. Anal Chem. 2003;75:1963–71. doi: 10.1021/ac026359i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tabb DL, et al. Statistical characterization of ion trap tandem mass spectra from doubly charged tryptic peptides. Anal Chem. 2003;75:1155–63. doi: 10.1021/ac026122m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





QEIVDYIADK
IEQLSDYNR
TVTTAF
G
TGVSLR