Table 1.
Bi-variate logistic regression analysis of teenage marital pregnancy
| 95.0% C.I. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | S.E. | OR | Lower | Upper | |
| Age | |||||
| 15-19 RC | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||
| 20-24 | 0.344 | 0.252 | 1.410 | 0.860 | 2.311 |
| 25-29 | -2.727 | 0.618 | 0.065*** | 0.019 | 0.220 |
| Education | |||||
| No RC | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||
| Yes | -1.289 | 0.448 | 0.276** | 0.115 | 0.664 |
| Occupation | |||||
| Not working RC | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||
| Working | -0.082 | 0.413 | 0.921 | 0.410 | 2.070 |
| Desire number of children | |||||
| 2 RC | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||
| >2 | 1.064 | 0.240 | 2.899*** | 1.811 | 4.640 |
| Husband education | |||||
| No RC | 1.000 | ||||
| Yes | -0.998 | 0.423 | 0.369* | 0.161 | 0.845 |
| Birth place | |||||
| Rural RC | 1.000 | ||||
| Urban | -1.358 | 0.271 | 0.257*** | 0.151 | 0.438 |
| Family type | |||||
| Nuclear RC | 1.000 | ||||
| Joint | -0.136 | 0.248 | 0.873 | 0.537 | 1.418 |
| Mass Media exposure | |||||
| No exposure RC | 1.000 | ||||
| Exposure to 1 media | -1.275 | 0.387 | 0.280** | 0.131 | 0.597 |
| Exposure to >1 media | -0.801 | 0.247 | 0.449** | 0.277 | 0.728 |
B = Beta Coefficient; SE = Standard Error, OR = Odds Ratio; CI = Confidence Interval
RC = Reference category
***p < 0.001, **p > 0.01, *p < 0.05