Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 31;38(2):1037–1044. doi: 10.1118/1.3544657

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Magnitude of errors in the mean contralateral parotid dose vs conventional IMRT QA performance metric of Gamma passing rate (%) averaged over all beams per plan. (b) Magnitude of errors in the mean ipsilateral parotid dose vs conventional IMRT QA performance metric of Gamma passing rate (%) averaged over all beams per plan. Data are shown for three different sets of Gamma parameters.