Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 23;10:95. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-95

Table 3.

Odd ratios for effect of beverage sugar intake and animal protein intake on overweight at 8 years

Total group
N = 120
Subgroup
N = 63
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Model 1a beverage sugar 1.10 (1.02, 1.18) 0.009 1.13 (1.03, 1.25) 0.014
Model 1b animal protein 4.06 (1.50, 11.00) 0.006 3.32 (0.86, 12.76) 0.080
Model 2a beverage sugar 1.10 (1.02, 1.20) 0.021 1.15 (1.00, 1.34) 0.058
Model 2b animal protein 7.38 (2.17, 25.10) 0.001 5.69 (1.03, 31.45) 0.046
Model 2 beverage sugar 1.11 (1.03, 1.20) 0.005 1.14 (1.03, 1.26) 0.011
Model 2 animal protein 4.78 (1.65, 13.87) 0.004 3.94 (0.90, 17.27) 0.069
Model 3 beverage sugar 1.13 (1.03, 1.24) 0.009 1.16 (1.01, 1.33) 0.042
Model 3 animal protein 9.67 (2.56, 36.53) 0.001 6.77 (1.09, 42.22) 0.041
Model 4 beverage sugar - - 1.21 (1.02, 1.42) 0.027
Model 4 animal protein - - 11.01 (1.16, 104.2) 0.036

Model 1a, 1b: unadjusted effects (a and b indicate two separate analyses)

Model 2a, 2b: adjusted for sex, infant age, infant body weight, breastfed at time of assessment, SES (a and b indicate two separate analyses)

Model 2: adjusted for each other (beverage sugar and animal protein)

Model 3: adjusted for each other, plus sex, infant age, infant body weight, breastfed at time of assessment, SES

Model 4: adjusted as model 3 plus maternal overweight, physical activity in hours per week, and energy intake at 8 years in kcal per day.