Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011 Jul 8;96(3):443–451. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2011.06.017

Table 1.

List of progression of operant behavioral paradigms employed, number of training sessions, and primary psychological construct assessed by each task. The numerator in Number Completing Training ratio indicates how many mice were unable to complete the full number of training sessions, and the denominator the number who began training in that task.

Task Main Construct(s) Measured Sessions Number Completing Training
Fixed Ratio Simple operant contingency ~3 WT=8/8 Tg2576=7/8
Alternation Simple response rule learning ~8 WT=8/8 Tg2576=6/7
Light-Dark Discrimination Simple discrimination 10 WT=8/8 Tg2576=6/6
Chained FR1-FR1-FR1 Completion of a response sequence; behavioral flexibility 5 WT=8/8 Tg2576=6/6
Non-Match to Position Complex, conditional discrimination; behavioral flexibility 40 WT=8/8 Tg2576=5/6
Delayed NMTP Short-term (working memory) 28 WT=8/8 Tg2576=3/6
Reaction Time Motor initiation 15 WT=8/8 Tg2576=2/3
Signal Detection Sustained attention 10 WT=4/4* Tg2576=3/3#
Progressive Ratio Reinforcer strength 10 WT=4/4 Tg2576=3/3

WT = wild type mice

*

Randomly discontinued to balance N's

#

one mouse returned after illness