Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 7;20(9):1576–1586. doi: 10.1002/pro.687

Table I.

Integrated Success Rates of Selected Potentials and Combinations Thereof

Terms #Terms ISR
Individual potentials ZRANK scoring function 1 0.350
ZDOCK scoring function 1 0.349
ZKS/a 1 0.121
ZKS 1 0.140
TB 1 0.288
LLS 1 0.194
GSVB 1 0.072
ZRANK combined with ZDOCK terms and reoptimized ZRANK terms 6 0.333
ZRANK terms + ZDOCK_VDW/a 6 0.299
ZRANK terms + ZDOCK_VDW/r 6 0.338
ZRANK terms + ZDOCK_Elec 6 0.327
ZRANK terms + IFACE(ZD) 6 0.407
ZRANK terms + IFACE(ZRa) 6 0.401
ZRANK terms + ZDOCK_VDW/a + ZDOCK_VDW/r 7 0.341
ZRANK terms with pair potentialsb ZRANK terms + ZKS/a + #ZKS/a 7 0.412
ZRANK terms + ZKS + #ZKS 7 0.402
ZRANK terms + TB + #TB 7 0.388
ZRANK terms + LLS + #LLS 7 0.380
ZRANK terms + GSVB + #GSVB 7 0.354
ZRANK terms with CJc ZRANK terms + CJ(ZKS/a) + #CJ(ZKS/a) 7 0.373
ZRANK terms + CJ(ZKS) + #CJ(ZKS) 7 0.378
ZRANK terms + CJ(TB) + #CJ(TB) 7 0.360
ZRANK terms + CJ(LLS) + #CJ(LLS) 7 0.366
ZRANK terms + CJ(GSVB) + #CJ(GSVB) 7 0.349
Combine best terms ZRANK terms + IFACE + ZKS/a + #ZKS/a 8 0.425
ZRANK terms + IFACE + CJ(ZKS/a) + #CJ(ZKS/a) 8 0.408
ZRANK terms + IFACE + ZKS/a + #ZKS/a + CJ(ZKS/a) + #CJ(ZKS/a) 10 0.419

Entries in bold are emphasized in the text.

a

In the ZRANK framework, evaluated using exact positions and not using the ZDOCK grid.

b

Terms starting with ‘#’ denote the number of pair-wise interactions.

c

CJ calculated with contact defined as in the pair potentials.