Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2011 Sep;20(4):330–335. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2011.598837

Table 2.

Engagement / Retention Issues in Intervention

Experience Themes Brief Prevention/Intervention Long Term Intervention
Prevention Treatment
Engagement / Retention
Staff/Client Match Δ Mensinger et al.,2006 Orrell-Valente et al., 1999 Prinz et al., 2001; Boyd-Franklin et al.,1997 Mensinger et al., 2006 Coatsworth et al., 2006
Client/Family Transience Δ Capaldi et al., 1997
Parent/Family Dysfunction Problems Δ Al-Halabi Diaz et al., 2006 Orrell-Valente et al., 1999 Gottfredson et al., 2006
Parent Attempt to Obtain Nurturance Δ
Need for Cultural Themes Brody et al.,2004 Boyd-Franklin et al., 1997 Jackson-Gilfort et al.,2001 Liddle et al., 2006
Treatment Readiness Mensinger et al., 2006 Mensinger et al., 2006
Logistical Support/Practical Obstacles Δ Mesninger et al., 2006 Capaldi et al., 1997; Heinrichs et al., 2005 Lee et al., 2006 Brown et al., 2003 Mitrani et al., 2003 Mensinger et al., 2006
Payment for Retention Δ Heinrichs, 2006; Capaldi et al., 1997
Family Support Mitrani et al., 2003; Brown et al., 2003
Maintaining Contact Δ Capaldi et al., 1997
Duality of Participant Coatsworth et al., 2006
Δ

Indicates issues encountered in the Brief Intervention Truancy project and Brief Intervention Court project.