Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec;6(4):281–288. doi: 10.1089/met.2008.0026

Table 3.

Summary of Statistical Analysis in Women

 
Spearman correlation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Two-way analysis of variance
Women Variable n r1 versus Percent total body fat r2 versus truncal fat to lower body fat ratio P value (r1 vs. r2) ANOVA factor ANOVA p value
Percent total body fat 1448   0.36      
TG 1448 0.19 0.40 <0.0001 %Total body fat 0.0003
          T/L ratio <0.0001
          Interactiona 0.03
HDL 1448 −0.16 −0.29 <0.0001 %Total body fat <0.0001
          T/L ratio <0.0001
          Interactiona 0.36
HOMA-IR 1435 0.46 0.43 0.327827 %Total body fat <0.0001
          T/L ratio <0.0001
          Interactiona 0.11
SBP 1448 0.27 0.25 0.45 %Total body fat <0.0001
          T/L ratio <0.0001
          Interactiona 0.11
a

Interaction between percent body fat and truncal-to-lower body fat (T/L) ratio.

Note: TG, triglyceride; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance; SBP, systolic blood pressure; T/L ratio, truncal-to-lower body fat ratio.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure