Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 20;286(38):33409–33421. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.279596

TABLE 1.

Site-directed mutagenesis data

The figures for binding and displacement experiments are written in boldface type if significant changes were observed upon mutation of the receptor.

CCR5 mutantsa 2D7 geometric MFI (% WT-CCR5) CTC5 geometric MFI (% WT-CCR5) [125I]CCL3 binding (% WT -CCR5) [35S]gp120 binding (% WT-CCR5) MVC
[3H]MVC binding KDb Displacement of [125I]CCL3 IC50b
TM1 Y37A 115 ± 13 106 ± 6.9 14 ± 1.1 (13)c 41 ± 7.5 (37)c 0.80 2.2 ± 1.3
TM1 Y37F 86 ± 28 103 ± 11 78 ± 10 (88) 53 ± 1.5 (59) 1.10 0.9 ± 0.2
TM2 W86A 117 ± 0.4 112 ± 1.6 40 ± 2.1 (35) <10 42.9 ± 13
ECL1 W94A 140 ± 15 121 ± 7.3 <10 <10 0.79 ± 0.3
ECL1 W94M 103 ± 7.5 108 ± 3.4 <10 <10 1.18 ± 0.1
ECL1 M100A 114 ± 14 122 ± 17 95 ± 1.0 (82) 127 ± 21 (107) 1.0 ± 0.1
ECL1 M100T 79 ± 9.3 86 ± 10 42 ± 4.1 (52) 53 ± 1.5 (65) 0.63 1.3 ± 0.3
TM3 L104A 131 ± 18 113 ± 1.7 81 ± 6.3 (67) 127 ± 19 (97) 1.07 0.9 ± 0.2
TM3 L104F 128 ± 17 107 ± 8.2 43 ± 3.8 (37) 53 ± 21 (46) 2.05 1.2 ± 0.2
TM3 Y108A 65 ± 21 92 ± 8.0 44 ± 13 (49) <10 75.5 ± 6.4
TM3 F109A 91 ± 7.3 82 ± 6.8 159 ± 1.0 (186) 23 ± 11 (27) 1.43 1.4 ± 0.2
TM3 F109H 106 ± 6.1 105 ± 18 179 ± 23 (174) 24 ± 0.7 (23) 1.5 ± 0.1
TM3 F112A 21 ± 1.5 28 ± 2.3 23 ± 7.6 (101) 31 ± 7.6 (121) 0.4 ± 0.2
TM3 F112Y 125 ± 25 112 ± 31 104 ± 19 (89) 169 ± 3.6 (115) 1.1 ± 0.3
TM4 G145A 137 ± 2.7 130 ± 6.1 103 ± 11 (78) 150 ± 17 (113) 0.60 1.3 ± 0.3
ECL2 R168A 77 ± 8.7 67 ± 11 47 ± 8.5 (64) 45 ± 11 (72) 1.3 ± 0.5
ECL2 T177A 92 ± 2.2 118 ± 4.3 13 ± 4.4 (13) 8.1 ± 6.1 (7.6) 1.70 1.4 ± 0.5
ECL2 T177Q 82 ± 13 98 ± 9.2 13 ± 1.6 (15) 18 ± 6.7 (22) 0.79 1.3 ± 0.2
ECL2 C178A 0 ± 0 74 ± 37 <10 <10
ECL2 S180A 124 ± 1.1 120 ± 13 85 ± 14 (69) 139 ± 19 (115) 1.10 0.9 ± 0.0
ECL2 S180P 85 ± 1.7 94 ± 2.0 58 ± 8.9 (65) <10 0.56 0.9 ± 0.1
ECL2-TM5 Y184A 160 ± 37 134 ± 23 33 ± 7.7 (23) 133 ± 27 (122) 2.1 ± 0.7
ECL2-TM5 Y187A 88 ± 10 112 ± 8.5 <10 144 ± 8.0 (161) 1.19 ± 0.5
ECL2-TM5 F189A 57 ± 3.9 73 ± 4.4 71 ± 2.6 (110) <10 1.5 ± 0.0
ECL2-TM5 W190A 22 ± 13 84 ± 46 16 ± 0.4 (19) <10 1.6 ± 0.8
ECL2-TM5 Q194A 105 ± 4.5 110 ± 2.0 84 ± 5.8 (78) 162 ± 40 (150) 0.43 0.6 ± 0.2
ECL2-TM5 Q194H 104 ± 1.4 113 ± 4.7 85 ± 6.4 (78) 184 ± 40 (169) 2.40 5.6 ± 0.9
TM5 I198A 124 ± 14 118 ± 12 130 ± 4.7 (109) 49 ± 0.8 (41) 17.40 131 ± 29
TM6 W248A 3.6 ± 2.3 14 ± 0.4 <10 <10
TM6 Y251A 10 ± 2.4 31 ± 0.1 13 ± 4.8 (64) <10 7.7 ± 2.3
TM6 Y251F 68 ± 0.8 80 ± 3.6 88 ± 7.8 (120) 38 ± 9.3 (52) 3.3 ± 1.2
TM6 Y251I 4.8 ± 2.1 20 ± 1.8 14 ± 2.2 (119) <10 19.9 ± 2.1
TM6 N252A 101 ± 2.5 86 ± 3.9 46 ± 5.2 (49) 92 ± 29 (98) 0.80 1.1 ± 0.4
TM6 N252I 141 ± 14 137 ± 8.4 16 ± 0.8 (12) 147 ± 6.2 (106) 0.44 1.2 ± 0.3
TM6 L255A 39 ± 2.5 41 ± 0.5 49 ± 0.1 (123) 30 ± 2.5 (76) 2.3 0.9 ± 0.5
TM6 N258A 91 ± 5.5 86 ± 8.6 68 ± 4.5 (77) 123 ± 5.9 (140) 0.48 0.4 ± 0.3
TM6-ECL3 N258M 85 ± 6.0 87 ± 0.3 71 ± 0.4 (82) 85 ± 3.3 (98) 1.27 0.7 ± 0.2
TM6-ECL3 N258Q 138 ± 2.9 141 ± 7.2 81 ± 2.4 (58) 149 ± 28 (107) 1.10 1.2 ± 0.2
TM6-ECL3 F260A 40 ± 5.1 60 ± 15 46 ± 3.8 (97) 13 ± 13 (32) 0.8 ± 0.0
TM7 Q280A 106 ± 6.2 110 ± 2.0 84 ± 6.6 (78) 128 ± 21 (119) 0.74 1.1 ± 0.1
TM7 E283A 70 ± 4.3 75 ± 8.1 21 ± 3.7 (30) <10 undd >10,000
TM7 E283Q 92 ± 3.2 99 ± 6.6 33 ± 11 (35) 26 ± 12 (28) undd >10,000

a The seven transmembrane helices of CCR5 are defined as follows: TM1 from Ile-28 to Asn-57; TM2 from Met-64 to Gln-93; TM3 from Asn-98 to Val-130; TM4 from Thr-143 to Ile-165; TM5 from Lys-191 to Gly-216; TM6 from Arg-230 to Leu-255; and TM7 from Gln-277 to Tyr-297. The first, second, and third extracellular loops are defined using TM boundaries (ECL1 between TM2 and TM3, ECL2 between TM4 and TM5, and ECL3 between TM6 and TM7). ECL2-TM5 and TM6-ECL3 are ECL2 and ECL3 and are expected to adopt a helical structure according to CXCR4 x-ray structure.

b Fold change is compared with WT-CCR5 (KD = 0.69 ± 0.26 nm, lC50 = 1.05 ± 0.61 nm).

c Numbers in parentheses are corrected with the cell-surface expression level of CCR5 mutants compared with that of WT-CCR5 (for the CCR5 mutants Y108A and W190A, binding of radioligands was corrected with their receptor expression level determined using the CTC5 mAb only).

d Data were undetectable.