Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 10;301(3):H921–H935. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01055.2010

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Dependence of relative RyR open probability on relative changes of CaSR and CaDyad as well as CaTot. Left: changes in the Ca2+ contents of SR (dashed line) and dyadic subspace (solid line) change the open probability of RyRs (here shown as steady-state open probability). Right: model-predicted changes of open probability when CaTot is changed (dotted line) and due to the respective underlying changes of CaSR (dashed) and CaDyad (solid line). Top to bottom: Matsuoka03, Iribe06, and Iyer07 models (results for the Shannon04 and Fink08 models were similar to the Iyer07 model). Note that in the Matsuoka03 model the RyR open probability was more sensitive to increasing SR content than to dyadic subspace, whereas the Iribe06 model showed a decrease in RyR open probability with increasing CaSR content. The sensitivity in the Matsuoka03 model to the SR content was more than compensated by the more drastic change in CaDyad concentration (top right), leading to an overall higher sensitivity to CaDyad.