Table 2.
Comparisons of registry (LACSP) information against self-reported NHPIs status by race and birthplace, Los Angeles County, California, 2000–2004
| Self-reported race
|
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHPIs | Non-NHPIs | Total | ||||||
| LACSP | NHPIs | 16 (89%) | 10 (4%) | 26 (10%) | 89 | 96 | 62 | 99 |
| Race | Non-NHPIs | 2 (11%) | 244 (96%) | 246 (90%) | ||||
| Total | 18 (100%) | 254 (100%) | 272 (100%) | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Self-reported birthplace
|
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | ||||
| NHPIs | Non-NHPIs | Total | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| LACSP | NHPIs | 22 (88%) | 2 (1%) | 24 (9%) | 88 | 99 | 92 | 99 |
| Birthplacea | Non-NHPIs | 3 (12%) | 244 (99%) | 247 (91%) | ||||
| Total | 25 (100%) | 246 (100%) | 271 (100%) | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Self-reported race
|
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | ||||
| NHPIs | Non-NHPIs | Total | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| LACSP | NHPIs | 14 (78%) | 10 (4%) | 24 (9%) | 78 | 96 | 58 | 98 |
| Birthplace | Non-NHPIs | 4 (22%) | 244 (96%) | 248 (91%) | ||||
| Total | 18 (100%) | 254 (100%) | 272 (100%) | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Self-reported race
|
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | ||||
| NHPIs | Non-NHPIs | Total | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| LACSP | NHPIs | 13 (72%) | 6 (2%) | 19 (7%) | 72 | 98 | 68 | 98 |
| Race + Birthplace | Non-NHPIs | 5 (28%) | 248 (98%) | 253 (93%) | ||||
| Total | 18 (100%) | 254 (100%) | 272 (100%) | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Self-reported race or birthplace
|
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | ||||
| NHPIs | Non-NHPIs | Total | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| LACSP | NHPIs | 18 (95%) | 13 (5%) | 31 (11%) | 95 | 95 | 58 | 100 |
| Race or birthplacea | Non-NHPIs | 1 (5%) | 240 (95%) | 241 (89%) | ||||
| Total | 19 (100%) | 253 (100%) | 272 (100%) | |||||
a
Assuming CSP birthplace of Hawaii was correct if self-reported U.S.-born