. 2011 Mar 15;1(1):e000062. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000062

Table 3.

Logistic regression analyses with the outcome diabetes status and adjusted for variables shown in the table as well as age

Explanatory variables	General population only (n=3335)
	Atopic dermatitis¹⁸
	Crude OR with 95% CI	Adjusted OR^* with 95% CI
Sex
Men	1 (reference)	1 (reference)
Women	2.27 (1.79 to 2.95)^†, p<0.001	2.25 (1.74 to 2.89)^†, p<0.001
Filaggrin
Wild type	1 (reference)	1 (reference)
Null mutation	2.71 (1.92 to 3.71)^†, p<0.001	2.65 (1.92 to 3.67)^†, p<0.001
Group
Non-diabetic	1 (reference)	1 (reference)
Screen-detected diabetes	0.91 (0.39 to 2.12)	1.22 (0.51 to 2.89)
Self-reported diabetes	1.42 (0.85 to 2.37)	1.72 (1.01 to 2.93)^†, p=0.045

Non-diabetic: healthy controls from the general population in Copenhagen; Screen-detected diabetes: diabetes screening group defined as subjects who did not report diabetes but who had a fasting blood glucose ≥7 and/or glycated haemoglobin ≥6.5%; Self-reported diabetes: diabetes group defined as subjects who gave an affirmative answer to the question: ‘Have you ever been told that you suffered from diabetes?’

Mutually adjusted for variables shown in the table and age.

^†

Statistically significant.