Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 12.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2008 Jul 8;35(3):308–318. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9035-x

Table 2.

Fit indices and reliabilities for barrier self-efficacy, temptations, and decisional balance by genders, age groups, and ethnicities

Measure subgroup χ2 (df) CFI SRMR Cronbach α
Affect Competing demands Pros Cons
Barrier self-efficacy
 Total sample 68.88 (9) 0.95 0.03 0.85
 Males 30.33 (9) 0.96 0.03 0.84
 Females 55.18 (9) 0.95 0.04 0.84
 18–34 years 31.75 (9) 0.94 0.04 0.83
 35–54 years 52.02 (9) 0.93 0.05 0.84
 55+ years 20.30 (9) 0.98 0.03 0.84
 Caucasian 36.75 (9) 0.95 0.04 0.83
 Pacific Islanders 34.86 (9) 0.94 0.04 0.87
 Asian 26.41 (9) 0.95 0.04 0.81
Temptations (i.e., affect and competing demands)
 Total sample 76.26 (13) 0.97 0.04 0.87 0.91
 Men 31.01 (13) 0.98 0.04 0.79 0.90
 Women 58.57 (13) 0.98 0.04 0.77 0.91
 18–34 years 29.51 (13) 0.98 0.05 0.73 0.91
 35–54 years 24.83 (13) 0.99 0.04 0.78 0.91
 55+ years 49.13 (13) 0.96 0.04 0.79 0.90
 Caucasian 41.10 (13) 0.97 0.05 0.81 0.90
 Pacific Islanders 21.12 (13) 0.99 0.04 0.76 0.92
 Asian 37.54 (13) 0.97 0.05 0.74 0.91
Decisional Balance (i.e., pros and cons)
 Total sample 69.02 (26) 0.97 0.04 0.83 0.71
Men 56.14 (26) 0.95 0.07 0.83 0.68
 Women 66.74 (26) 0.96 0.04 0.81 0.70
 18–34 years 39.29 (26) 0.96 0.05 0.80 0.64
 35–54 years 58.95 (26) 0.95 0.06 0.79 0.74
 55+ years 35.05 (26) 0.99 0.04 0.88 0.71
 Caucasian 40.07 (26) 0.97 0.04 0.82 0.60
 Pacific Islanders 26.87 (26) 0.99 0.04 0.81 0.72
 Asian 66.75 (26) 0.94 0.08 0.86 0.74

α alpha or internal consistency, df degrees of freedom, χ2 chi-square, CFI comparative fit index, SRMR standardized root mean square residual