Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Synapse. 2011 May 16;65(10):1099–1105. doi: 10.1002/syn.20944

TABLE 1.

Table of values indicate results of pairwise comparison of active and inactive lever responses between treatment groups with cues on the extinction day indicated

Day: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

Extinction Session: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Cues Active Lever Vehicle vs Low DCS t 3.289 2.802 2.585 2.667 2.436 2.667 2.369 3.303 2.369 2.423 4.413 2.761 2.328 3.161 2.247

P 0.001 0.006 0.011 0.008 0.015 0.008 0.019 0.001 0.019 0.016 <0.001 0.006 0.021 0.002 0.026

Vehicle vs High DCS t 2.734 2.707 2.423 2.276 3.343 2.233 3.425 2.328 2.017 2.815

P 0.007 0.007 0.016 0.024 0.001 0.027 <0.001 0.021 0.045 0.005

Inactive Lever Vehicle vs Low DCS t 2.153 1.976 2.011

P 0.032 0.049 0.045

Vehicle vs High DCS t 1.976 2.294 2.188

P 0.049 0.022 0.029

P and t values reported for sessions where maintenance responses were greater than the indicated day of extinction, with unadjusted P < 0.05. “Day” indicates experiment day.