. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 13.

Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2011 Jul;25(4):520–534. doi: 10.1037/a0022550

Table 4.

Significant Analysis of Variance Results: Hemisphere (Hem) Asymmetries for Degree of Activity

Pseudoword reading

Effect	ROI	Latency window
Hem × Time × Group	LOC (NI & RD groups), F(1, 98) = 9.52, p < .003	350–650 ms
LH > RH	NI & ADHD groups, F(1, 49) = 28.55, p < .0001
Hem × Time × Group	ANG, F(13, 1274) = 2.03, p < .01	350–500 ms
LH > RH	NI & ADHD groups, F(1, 49) = 12.42, p < .001
LH > RH	STS (all groups), F(1, 98) = 13.14, p < .0001	450–650 ms
LH > RH	Fusiform (all groups), F(1, 98) = 4.59, p < .03	100–700 ms
LH > RH	LOC (NI & RD groups), F(1, 98) = 9.52, p < .003	100–700 ms
LH > RH	IFG (NI & RD groups), F(1, 98) = 7.54, p < .007	100–800 ms
Letter-Sound Naming
LH > RH	SMG (all groups; p < .002)	100–800 ms
LH > RH	Fusiform (all groups; p < .006)	100–800 ms

Note. ROI = Region of Interest; LH = left hemisphere; RH = right hemisphere; SMG = supramarginal gyms; NI = nonreading impaired; ADHD = attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ANG = angular gyms; STS = superior temporal sulcus; LOC = lateral occipitotemporal cortex; IFG = inferior