Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 1;5(4):918–927. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500415

Table 3.

Age-Standardized Prevalence Rates of Various Cardiometabolic Risk Factorsa,b

Cardiometabolic risk factors Middle income group (Asiad Colony, Tirumangalam) Low income group (Bharathi Nagar, T.Nagar)


Baseline study (n = 479) Follow-up study (n = 526) % change p valuec Baseline study (n = 783) Follow-up study (n = 596) % change p valuec
Diabetes (self-reported + newly diagnosed) n (%) 99 (12.4%) 119 (15.4%) h 24% .159 53 (6.5%) 105 (15.3%) h 135% <.001

Impaired glucose tolerance n (%) 50 (7.5%) 49 (6.4%) i -15% .513 24 (2.9%) 15 (2.3%) i -21% .503

Hypertension (self-reported + newly diagnosed) n (%) 153 (14.9%) 159 (21.8%) h 46% <.05 126 (8.4%) 131 (20.1%) h 139% <.001

Generalized obesity n (%)
 Male 83 (38.0%) 109 (46.5%) h 22% <.05 44 (13.4%) 66 (28.0%) h 109% <.001
 Female 113 (33.1%) 163 (48.1%) h 45% <.001 111 (24.2%) 184 (50.2%) h 107% <.001

Central obesity n (%)
 Male 137 (53.4%) 142 (51.9%) i -3% .625 100 (30.8%) 122 (50.9%) h 65% <.001
 Female 88 (41.6%) 151 (41.7%) h 0.2% .977 82 (16.9%) 183 (49.8%) h 195% <.001

Hypercholesterolemia n (%) 173 (24.2%) 126 (20.8%) i -14% .184 121 (14.2%) 123 (20.4%) h 44% <.05

Hypertriglyceridemia n (%) 132 (7.6%) 134 (27.2%) h 258% <.05 144 (8.0%) 135 (23.5%) h 194% <.001
a

Values are presented as numbers (percentages).

b

Prevalence rates were age-standardized to the 1991 census of India.

c

p value implies significance between baseline and follow-up visit.