Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 28;11:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-11-15

Table 1.

Summary of the 12 studies included for meta-analysis

Study Total Sample Size(n) Adverse effects¥ Mean Age % Male Trial Duration with 1 mg BID dose(Weeks) Size of Trial group Size of Control Group Cochrane risk of bias assessment§

P Q R S T U Overall score
Gonzales et al (2006)32 696 A, B, C 42.55 52.05 12 352 344 1 1 1 1 1 1 6/6
Jorenby et al(2006)29 685 A, B, C 43.45 56.65 12 344 341 1 1 1 1 1 0 5/6
Oncken et al(2006)27 259 A, B, C 41.1 50.2 12 130 129 1 1 1 1 0 0 4/6
Nides et al(2006)25 248 A, B 41.7 51.2 6 125 123 1 1 0 1 1 0 4/6
Nakamura et al(2007)30 310 A, B 40 77.6 12 156 154 1 1 1 1 1 1 6/6
Tsai et al(2007)28 250 A, B 40.3 88.8 12 126 124 1 1 0 1 1 0 4/6
Williams et al(2007)26 377 A, B, C 47.7 48.6 52 251 126 1 1 0 1 1 0 4/6
Niaura et al(2008)34 312 A 41.8 51.9 12 157 155 1 1 1 1 1 0 5/6
Wang et al(2009)33 333 A 38.7 96.7 12 165 168 1 1 0 1 1 0 4/6
Rigotti et al(2010)31 714 A, B 56.45 78.7 12 355 359 1 1 0 1 1 1 5/6
Fagerstrom et al(2010)8 431 A 43.9 89.3 12 213 218 1 1 1 1 1 1 6/6
Tashkin et al(2010)24 499 A, C 57.2 62.3 12 248 251 1 1 0 1 1 0 4/6

¥A = Nausea, B = Constipation, C-Flatulence

#Denote use of 1-week low-dose titration treatment

§Cochrane risk of bias assessment: P = Allocation sequence adequately generated?; Q = Allocation adequately concealed?; R = Knowledge of allocated intervention adequately concealed?; S = incomplete outcome data adequately addressed?; T = Reports free of selective outcome reporting?; U = study free of other factors leading to high risk of bias?; 1 = item positive; 0 = negative or unknown.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure