Table 2.
Correlations between variables (n = 89)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | ||||||||
| 2 | .14 | – | |||||||
| 3 | .21* | .18+ | – | ||||||
| 4 | .20+ | .00 | .16 | – | |||||
| 5 | −.06 | .03 | .04 | −.31** | – | ||||
| 6 | −.09 | −.17 | .05 | .04 | .34** | – | |||
| 7 | .10 | −.01 | .27** | .24* | −.10 | −.14 | – | ||
| 8 | −.14 | −.14 | −.13 | −.16 | .01 | .08 | −.22* | – | |
| 9 | .09 | −.13 | −.11 | −.12 | .23* | .34** | −.24* | −.11 | – |
Variables: 1 = mothers’ education; 2 = child’s gender; 3 = income-to-needs; 4 = child support; 5 = parenting stress; 6 = frequency of spanking; 7 = frequency of nonresident fathers’ contact; 8 = mothers’ satisfaction with father–child relationship; 9 = teacher-reported behavior problems
Dummy coding for child’s gender: 0 = boy; 1 = girl. Dummy coding for child support: 0 = no; 1 = yes
+ p < .10; * p < .05; ** p < .01