Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 19;108(41):16932-16937. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109372108

Table 2.

Predicted contributions to the m-value/RT or μ23/RT for exposure of 1,000 2 of protein surface

Process
Surface of native protein
Surface type, i
Globular protein unfolding*
α-helix melting
∆ASA Urea§ GB§ ∆ASA Urea§ GB§ ASA Urea§ GB§
Amide O 120 −0.10 0.34 480 −0.42 1.34 100 −0.09 0.28
Carboxylate O 40 −0.02 0.12 100 −0.04 0.29 160 −0.06 0.46
Hydroxyl O 30 −0.01 0.0 0 0 0 20 −0.01 0.0
Amide N 50 −0.02 −0.10 90 −0.03 −0.18 40 −0.01 −0.08
Cationic N 40 0.01 −0.05 0 0 0 130 0.02 −0.16
Aliphatic C 650 −0.07 0.20 330 −0.04 0.10 530 −0.06 0.16
Aromatic C 70 −0.06 −0.16 0 0 0 20 −0.02 −0.05
Predicted m-value/RT or μ23/RT per 1,000 2 of surface: −0.27 0.35 −0.53 1.55 −0.22 0.61
Experimentally derived value: −0.31 0.34 −1.01 ND −0.21 1.31

*Globular protein m- value/RT are from the average of the Hong et al. protein dataset (13) with the addition of trp cage (30) for urea, and from lacDBD (15) for GB. Both are scaled to 1,000 2.

Average observed α-helix unfolding m-value/RT for urea is calculated by multiplying the average residue urea m-value/RT of (AEAAKA)n peptides [-0.039 M-1; (19)] by 26, the number of residues needed to expose approximately 1,000 2 of surface in unfolding this α-helix.

Modeled using urea- and GB-BSA interaction data and BSA surface composition from refs. 4 and 18, scaled to 1,000 2 of surface.

§Contribution to unfolding m-value/RT or urea-native protein μ23/RT from each surface type (i), calculated from (αi values from Table 1) × ΔASAi.