Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011 Jun 6;1816(2):147–157. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2011.05.005

Table 2.

Viruses and ubiquitin-independent protein degradation by proteasomes

Virus class Degradation
inducer
Target substrate Absence of
ubiquitination
Unstable in
ts20 cells
Immune
to cDN
ubiquitin
Unstable
lysine-less
mutant
In vitro
degradation
Compelling
arguments
for ubiquitin-
independent
degradation?
Proposed mechanisms References
aDS-DNA
viruses
HPV E6 p53 Yes 20S dCP recognition of p53 upon
C-terminus binding to E6
67
HCMV pp71 Daxx Yes pp71-induced substrate binding to
19S eRP
98, Winkler and
Kalejta (manuscript
in prep)
HCMV pp71 Rb, p107, p130 Yes pp71-induced substrate binding to
19S RP
97, Winkler and
Kalejta (manuscript
in prep)
? HCMV pUL21a Yes 20S CP recognition of
unstructured pUL21a C-terminal
domain
103
? MCMV M141 Yes C-terminal fPEST domain as
degradation signal
105

bSS-DNA
viruses
? MVM NS2 Yes 20S CP recognition of NS2 C-
termius
111

Reverse
transcribing
viruses
? HBV X Not yet 20S CP binding; Chaperone Hdj1
participation
119-123
p14ARF HIV Tat Not yet 20S CP binding; PA28γ
participation
133, 135-136
HTLV Tax IκBα Not yet Tax-mediated recruitment of IκBa
to 20S CP
148-149

Postive
strand RNA
viruses
? HCV core Yes 20S CP binding; PA28γ
participation
156
? HCV F Yes 20S CP recognition of F (aa 20-
60)
158
a

DS-DNA: double stranded DNA

b

SS-DNA: single stranded DNA

c

DN: dominant-negative

d

CP: core particle

e

RP: regulartory particle

f

PEST: proline (P), glutamic acid (E), serine (S), and threonine (T).