Skip to main content
. 2011 May 20;167(3):623–633. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-2008-y

Table 3.

SIMPER (similarity percentage) analysis of behaviours of bank vole females in staged dyadic encounters against conspecific females and heterospecific (field vole females) opponents

Behaviour Discrimination by season Discrimination by opponent
Average abundance Contribution (%) to dissimilarity Average abundance Contribution (%) to dissimilarity
Winter Summer Bank vole Field vole
Explore 1.2 2.5 25 2 2 17
Approach 0.5 1.4 17 1.1 1.1 11
Threat 0.9 1.3 11 0.7 1.6 22
Touch 0.8 0.5 9 0.7 0.5 11
Avoid 0.2 1.1 15 0.5 1 13
Cumulative contribution 77 74

Results based on population means, presenting the variables mostly responsible for differences between season and opponent groups. Only behaviours are shown which contribute more than 10% to dissimilarity. Inclusion limit: major contribution (>70% of cumulative contribution to dissimilarity)