Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Glaucoma. 2013 Feb;22(2):127–132. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182254ba3

Table 3.

Mean differences (Mean) between IOP measurements and the 95% Limits of Agreement (LoA). LOA within observers were narrowest in DCT and ORAg groups, whereas LOA between observers were narrowest for DCT and GAT groups.

Operator#
(Trial#)
DCT GAT IOPg
Mean
(mmHg)
95%
LoA
Mean
(mmHg)
95%
LoA
Mean
(mmHg)
Intra-observer

1(1) vs 1(2) 0.32 −1.61 to 2.26 0.39 −3.83 to 4.60 0.13

1(2) vs 1(3) −0.13 −1.71 to 1.45 −0.10 −4.44 to 4.24 0.13

1(1) vs 1(3) 0.20 −1.95 to 2.35 0.29 −4.23 to 4.80 0.26

Inter-observer

1(1) vs 2(1) 0.90 −1.80 to 3.59 0.12 −3.95 to 4.18 1.48

2(1) vs 3(1) 0.50 −3.08 to 2.28 0.6 −2.71 to 3.71 1.7

1(1) vs 3(1) −0.40 −3.14 to 2.34 0.50 −2.78 to 3.78 0.21

DCT: Dynamic Contour Tonometer; GAT: Goldmann Applanation Tonometer; IOPg: Ocular Response Analyzer - Goldmann Estimated; IOPcc: Ocular Response Analyzer - Corneal Compensated