Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov;85(21):11090–11097. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00768-11

Table 1.

Traditional neutralization activities of anti-M and anti-H IgA and IgG MAbsa

MAb Specificity 15 μg/ml MAb
30 μg/ml MAb
Virus titer (PFU/well) % Reduction of virusb Virus titer (PFU/well) % Reduction of virusb
5H7-IgA Anti-M 34.00 ± 0.58 0.00 35.00 ± 2.31 0.00
5H7-IgG Anti-M 32.00 ± 0.58d 4.48 36.50 ± 0.87 0.00
16CD11-IgA Anti-H 7.50 ± 0.29c 77.61 3.00 ± 0.58c 91.04
16CD11-IgG Anti-H 14.50 ± 0.87c 56.72 13.00 ± 0.58c 61.19
Irrelevant IgA Anti-HIV gp41 30.50 ± 1.44d 8.96 31.00 ± 1.15d 7.46
No MAb 33.50 ± 0.87 0.00 33.50 ± 0.87 0.00
a

Experiments were repeated on at least two occasions with similar results. The results of a representative experiment are shown. The data are means ± standard errors of the mean (SEM) (n = 3).

b

Compared to no-antibody control.

c

Mean virus titers were significantly lower (P 0.0001) than those from cells exposed to no antibody.

d

Mean virus titers were not significantly lower (P 0.05) than those from cells exposed to no antibody.