Table 4.
Pairwise analyses of T-RFLP community profilesa
Day / Group | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 8 | 14 | 21 | |||||
Treatment Comparisons | A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B |
Control (A) vs CTC (B) | 0.797 | 0.021* | 0.025* | 0.732 | 0.338 | 0.542 | 0.308 | 0.267 |
Control (A) vs CR (B) | 0.908 | 0.423 | 0.023* | 0.441 | 0.570 | 0.547 | 0.181 | 0.151 |
Control (A) vs CTC+CR (B) | 0.807 | 0.024* | 0.053 | 0.153 | 0.298 | 0.599 | 0.059 | 0.063 |
CTC (A) vs CR (B) | 0.193 | 0.633 | 0.508 | 0.269 | 0.808 | 0.691 | 0.058 | 0.065 |
CTC (A) vs CTC+CR (B) | 0.827 | 0.593 | 0.738 | 0.127 | 0.698 | 0.746 | 0.212 | 0.218 |
CR (A) vs CTC+CR (B) | 0.416 | 0.042* | 0.227 | 0.008* | 0.450 | 0.653 | 0.057 | 0.052 |
aP values marked with an asterisk are significantly different (P = 0.05).