Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 24;32(6):1087–1095. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0204-3

Table 3.

Evaluation of HE4, CA 125 and ROMA efficacy in the determination of the risk of ovarian cancer (including only patients with benign gynaecological diseases and ovarian cancer)

Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Efficacy Youden indices
HE4 88/111 (79.3%) 282/285 (98.9%) 88/91 (96.7%) 282/305 (92.5%) 370/396 (93.4%) 0.782
CA 125 92/111 (82.9%) 202/285 (70.9%) 92/175 (52.6%) 202/221 (91.4%) 294/396 (74.2%) 0.538
ROMA 100/111 (90.1%) 250/285 (87.7%) 100/135 (74%) 250/261 (95.8%) 350/396 (88.4%) 0.778
Premenopausal HE4 17/27 (63%) 226/226 (100%) 17/17 (100%) 226/236 (95.8%) 243/253 (90.9%) 0.63
CA 125 20/27 (74.1%) 156/226 (69%) 20/90 (22.2%) 156/163 (95.7%) 176/253 (69.6%) 0.431
ROMA 20/27 (74.1%) 201/226 (88.9%) 20/45 (44.4%) 201/208 (96.6%) 221/253 (87.4%) 0.630
Postmenopausal HE4 71/84 (84.5%) 56/59 (94.9%) 71/74 (96%) 56/69 (81.2%) 127/143 (88.8%) 0.794
CA 125 72/84 (85.7%) 46/59 (78.0%) 72/85 (84.7%) 46/58 (79.3%) 118/143 (82.5%) 0.637
ROMA 80/84 (95.2%) 49/59 (83.1%) 80/90 (88.9%) 49/53 (92.5%) 129/143 (90.2%) 0.841

PPV positive predictive value; NPV negative predictive value