Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 2.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2011 Aug 2;59(1):530–539. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.085

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Representative labeling results for empirical studies. All results were generated by raters during the testing phase of the cylinder simulation (A) and cerebellum labeling (B) experiments. For illustrative purposes, we classify the range of observations into visually good classification (generally precise), bad classification (rules were followed but the labeled images are not visually close to the truth), and ugly classification (inconsistent with the expected ground truth).